<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chen, Chien-fei</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Rubens, Gerardo Zarazua</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yilmaz, Selin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bandurski, Karol</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bélafi, Zsófia Deme</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De Simone, Marilena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bavaresco, Mateus Vinícius</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, Yu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liu, Pei-ling</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barthelmes, Verena M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adams, Jacqueline</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">D&#039;Oca, Simona</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Przybylski, Łukasz</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Culture, conformity, and carbon? A multi-country analysis of heating and cooling practices in office buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Research &amp; Social Science</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Research &amp; Social Science</style></short-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan-03-2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">61</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">101344</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This study investigates human-building interaction in office spaces across multiple countries including Brazil, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, the United States, and Taiwan. We analyze social-psychological, contextual, and demographic factors to explain cross-country differences in adaptive thermal actions (i.e. cooling and heating behaviors) and conformity to the norms of sharing indoor environmental control features, an indicator of energy consumption. Specifically, personal adjustments such as putting on extra clothes are generally preferred over technological solutions such as adjusting thermostats in reaction to thermal discomfort. Social-psychological factors including attitudes, perceived behavioral control, injunctive norms, and perceived impact of indoor environmental quality on work productivity influence occupants’ intention to conform to the norms of sharing environmental control features. Lastly, accessibility to environmental control features, office type, gender, and age are also important factors. These findings demonstrate the roles of social-psychological and certain contextual factors in occupants’&lt;br /&gt;interactions with building design as well as their behavior of sharing environmental control features, both of which significantly influence building energy consumption, and thus, broader decarbonization.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Siyue Guo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chan Xiao</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ying Cui</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A novel approach for selecting typical hot-year (THY) weather data</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Energy</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Energy</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Actual weather data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heat wave</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiyear simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Residential indoor thermal environment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Typical hot year</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261919304659</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">242</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1634 - 1648</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The global climate change has resulted in not only warmer climate conditions but also more frequent extreme weather events, such as heat waves. However, the impact of heat waves on the indoor environment has been investigated in a limited manner. In this research, the indoor thermal environment is analyzed using a building performance simulation tool for a typical residential building in multiple cities in China, over a time period of 60 years using actual measured weather data, in order to gain a better understanding of the effect of heat wave events. The simulation results were used to analyze the indoor environment during hot summers. A new kind of weather data referred to as the typical hot year was defined and selected based on the simulated indoor environment during heat waves. The typical hot-year weather data can be used to simulate the indoor environment during extreme heat events and for the evaluation of effective technologies and strategies to mitigate against the impact of heat waves on the energy demand of buildings and human health. The limitations of the current study and future work are also discussed.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xu, Xiaodong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yin, Chenhuan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, Wei</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xu, Ning</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hong, Tianzhen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Li, Qi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Revealing Urban Morphology and Outdoor Comfort through Genetic Algorithm-Driven Urban Block Design in Dry and Hot Regions of China</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sustainability</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sustainability</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dry and hot areas; outdoor thermal comfort; urban morphology; urban performance simulation; genetic algorithm-driven</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan-07-2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3683https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3683/pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3683</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;In areas with a dry and hot climate, factors such as strong solar radiation, high temperature, low humidity, dazzling light, and dust storms can tremendously reduce people’s thermal comfort. Therefore, researchers are paying more attention to outdoor thermal comfort in urban environments as part of urban design. This study proposed an automatic workflow to optimize urban spatial forms with the aim of improvement of outdoor thermal comfort conditions, characterized by the universal thermal climate index (UTCI). A city with a dry and hot climate—Kashgar, China—is further selected as an actual case study of an urban block and Rhino &amp;amp; Grasshopper is the platform used to conduct simulation and optimization process with the genetic algorithm. Results showed that in summer, the proposed method can reduce the averaged UTCI from 31.17 to 27.43 °C, a decrease of about 3.74 °C, and reduce mean radiation temperature (MRT) from 43.94 to 41.29 °C, a decrease of about 2.65 °C.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjing An</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clustering and statistical analyses of air-conditioning intensity and use patterns in residential buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AC usage benchmarking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Air-conditioning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clustering analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">KPIs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">residential building</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Use pattern</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778818307199https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0378778818307199?httpAccept=text/xmlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0378778818307199?httpAccept=text/plain</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">174</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">214 - 227</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Energy conservation in residential buildings has gained increased attention due to its large portion of global energy use and potential of energy savings. Occupant behavior has been recognized as a key factor influencing the energy use and load diversity in buildings, therefore more realistic and accurate air-conditioning (AC) operating schedules are imperative for load estimation in equipment design and operation optimization. With the development of sensor technology, it became easier to access an increasing amount of heating/cooling data from thermal energy metering systems in residential buildings, which provides another possible way to understand building energy usage and occupant behaviors. However, except for cooling energy consumption benchmarking, there currently lacks effective and easy approaches to analyze AC usage and provide actionable insights for occupants. To fill this gap, this study proposes clustering analysis to identify AC use patterns of residential buildings, and develops new key performance indicators (KPIs) and data analytics to explore the AC operation characteristics using the long-term metered cooling energy use data, which is of great importance for inhabitants to understand their thermal energy use and save energy cost through adjustment of their AC use behavior. We demonstrate the proposed approaches in a residential district comprising 300 apartments, located in Zhengzhou, China. Main outcomes include: Representative AC use patterns are developed for three room types of residential buildings in the cold climate zone of China, which can be used as more realistic AC schedules to improve accuracy of energy simulation; Distributions of KPIs on household cooling energy usage are established, which can be used for household AC use intensity benchmarking and performance diagnoses.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjing An</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xing Shi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xing Jin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparative Study of Air-Conditioning Energy Use of Four Office Buildings in China and USA</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building envelope</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">climate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy consumption</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">office buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological choice</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">169</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Energy use in buildings has great variability. In order to design and operate low energy buildings as well as to establish building energy codes and standards and effective energy policy, it is crucial to understand and quantify key factors influencing building energy performance. This study investigates air-conditioning (AC) energy use of four office buildings in four locations: Beijing, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Berkeley. Building simulation was employed to quantify the influences of key factors, including climate, building envelope and occupant behavior. Through simulation of various combinations of the three influencing elements, it is found that climate can lead to AC cooling consumption differences by almost two times, while occupant behavior resulted in the greatest differences (of up to three times) in AC cooling consumption. The influence of occupant behavior on AC energy consumption is not homogeneous. Under similar climates, when the occupant behavior in the building differed, the optimized building envelope design also differed. Overall, the optimal building envelope should be determined according to the climate as well as the occupants who use the building.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rongpeng Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yoshinori Yura</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ryohei Hinokuma</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Novel Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Heat Recovery System Model: Development and Validation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building performance simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">controls</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">heat recovery</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">validation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Variable refrigerant flow</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">168</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;As one of the latest emerging HVAC technologies, the Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) system with heat recovery (HR) configurations has obtained extensive attention from both the academia and industry. Compared with the conventional VRF systems with heat pump (HP) configurations, VRF-HR is capable of recovering heat from cooling zones to heating zones and providing simultaneous cooling and heating operations. This can further lead to substantial energy saving potential and more flexible zonal control. In this paper, a novel model is developed to simulate the energy performance of VRF-HR systems. It adheres to a more physics-based development with the ability to simulate the refrigerant loop performance and consider the dynamics of more operational parameters, which is essential for representing more advanced control logics. Another key feature of the model is the introduction of component-level curves for indoor units and outdoor units instead of overall performance curves for the entire system, and thus it requires much fewer user-specified performance curves as model inputs. The validation study shows good agreements between the simulated energy use from the new VRF-HR model and the laboratory measurement data across all operational modes at sub-hourly time steps. The model has been adopted in the official release of the EnergyPlus simulation program since Version 8.6, which enables more accurate and robust assessments of VRF-HR systems to support their applications in energy retrofit of existing buildings or design of zero-net-energy buildings.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ying Cui</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chan Xiao</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xuan Luo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Zhang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparison of typical year and multiyear building simulations using a 55-year actual weather data set from China</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Energy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Actual weather data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiyear simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peak load  </style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Typical year</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">195</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">890-904</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Weather has significant impacts on the thermal environment and energy use in buildings. Thus, accurate weather data are crucial for building performance evaluations. Traditionally, typical year data inputs are used to represent long-term weather data. However, there is no guarantee that a single year represents the changing climate well. In this study, the long-term representation of a typical year was assessed by comparing it to a 55-year actual weather data set. To investigate the weather impact on building energy use, 559 simulation runs of a prototype office building were performed for 10 large cities covering all climate zones in China. The analysis results demonstrated that the weather data varied significantly from year to year. Hence, a typical year cannot reflect the variation range of weather fluctuations. Typical year simulations overestimated or underestimated the energy use and peak load in many cases. With the increase in computational power of personal computers, it is feasible and essential to adopt multiyear simulations for full assessments of long-term building performance, as this will improve decision-making by allowing for the full consideration of variations in building energy use.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hiroshi Yoshino</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natasa Nord</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEA EBC Annex 53: Total Energy Use in Buildings – Analysis and Evaluation Methods</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy data definition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy monitoring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Performance Evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">real energy use</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">152</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;One of the most significant barriers to achieving deep building energy efficiency is a lack of knowledge about the factors determining energy use. In fact, there is often a significant discrepancy between designed and real energy use in buildings, which is poorly understood but are believed to have more to do with the role of human behavior than building design. Building energy use is mainly influenced by six factors: climate, building envelope, building services and energy systems, building operation and maintenance, occupants’ activities and behavior, and indoor environmental quality. In the past, much research focused on the first three factors. However, the next three human-related factors can have an influence as significant as the first three. Annex 53 employed an interdisciplinary approach, integrating building science, architectural engineering, computer modeling and simulation, and social and behavioral science to develop and apply methods to analyze and evaluate the real energy use in buildings considering the six influencing factors. Outcomes from Annex 53 improved understanding and strengthen knowledge regarding the robust prediction of total energy use in buildings, enabling reliable quantitative assessment of energy-savings measures, policies, and techniques.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bing Dong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ardeshir Mahdavi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simona D&#039;Oca</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Isabella Gaetani</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaohang Feng</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Building</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEA EBC Annex 66</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Interdisciplinary approach</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">156</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;More than 30% of the total primary energy in the world is consumed in buildings. It is crucial to reduce building energy consumption in order to preserve energy resources and mitigate global climate change. Building performance simulations have been widely used for the estimation and optimization of building performance, providing reference values for the assessment of building energy consumption and the effects of energy-saving technologies. Among the various factors influencing building energy consumption, occupant behavior has drawn increasing attention. Occupant behavior includes occupant presence, movement, and interaction with building energy devices and systems. However, there are gaps in occupant behavior modeling as different energy modelers have employed varied data and tools to simulate occupant behavior, therefore producing different and incomparable results. Aiming to address these gaps, the International Energy Agency (IEA) Energy in Buildings and Community (EBC) Programme Annex 66 has established a scientific methodological framework for occupant behavior research, including data collection, behavior model representation, modeling and evaluation approaches, and the integration of behavior modeling tools with building performance simulation programs. Annex 66 also includes case studies and application guidelines to assist in building design, operation, and policymaking, using interdisciplinary approaches to reduce energy use in buildings and improve occupant comfort and productivity. This paper highlights the key research issues, methods, and outcomes pertaining to Annex 66, and offers perspectives on future research needs to integrate occupant behavior with the building life cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjing An</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Novel Stochastic Modeling Method to Simulate Cooling Loads in Residential Districts</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;District cooling systems are widely used in urban residential communities in China. Most district cooling systems are oversized;this leads to wasted investment and low operational efficiency and thus energy wastage. The accurate prediction of district cooling loads that supports rightsizing cooling plant equipment remains a challenge. This study developed a new stochastic modeling method that includes (1) six prototype house models representing a majority of apartments in the district, (2)occupant behavior models in residential buildings reflecting the temporal and spatial diversity and complexity based on a large-scale residential survey in China, and (3) a stochastic sampling process to represent all apartments and occupants in the district. The stochastic method was employed in a case study using the DeST simulation engine to simulate the cooling loads of a real residential district in Wuhan, China. The simulation results agree well with the actual measurement data based on five performance metrics representing the aggregated cooling loads, the peak cooling loads as well as the spatial load distribution,and the load profiles. Two currently used simulation methods were also employed to simulate the district cooling loads. The simulation results showed that oversimplified occupant behavior assumptions lead to significant overestimations of the peak cooling load and total district cooling loads. Future work will aim to simplify the workflow and data requirements of the stochastic method to enable its practical application as well as explore its application in predicting district heating loads and in commercial or mixed-use districts.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjing An</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wei Tian</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spatial Distribution of Internal Heat Gains: A Probabilistic Representation and Evaluation of Its Influence on Cooling Equipment Sizing in Large Office Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">air handling unit</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">chiller plant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">equipment sizing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internal heat gain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">spatial distribution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">spatial diversity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stochastic</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Internal heat gains from occupants, lighting, and plug loads are significant components of the space cooling load in an office building. Internal heat gains vary with time and space. The spatial diversity is significant, even for spaces with the same function in the same building. The stochastic nature of internal heat gains makes determining the peak cooling load to size air-conditioning systems a challenge. The traditional conservative practice of considering the largest internal heat gain among spaces and applying safety factors overestimates the space cooling load, which leads to oversized air-conditioning equipment and chiller plants. In this study, a field investigation of several large office buildings in China led to the development of a new probabilistic approach that represents the spatial diversity of the design internal heat gain of each tenant as a probability distribution function. In a large office building, a central chiller plant serves all air handling units (AHUs), with each AHU serving one or more floors of the building. Therefore, the spatial diversity should be considered differently when the peak cooling loads to size the AHUs and chillers are calculated. The proposed approach considers two different levels of internal heat gains to calculate the peak cooling loads and size the AHUs and chillers in order to avoid oversizing, improve the overall operating efficiency, and thus reduce energy use.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ying Cui</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjin Ma</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temporal and spatial characteristics of the urban heat island in Beijing and the impact on building design and energy performance</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">beijing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Microclimate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temporal and spatial characteristics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">urban heat island</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;With the increased urbanization in most countries worldwide, the urban heat island (UHI) effect, referring to the phenomenon that an urban area has higher ambient temperature than the surrounding rural area, has gained much attention in recent years. Given that Beijing is developing rapidly both in urban population and economically, the UHI effect can be significant. A long-term measured weather dataset from 1961 to 2014 for ten rural stations and seven urban stations in Beijing, was analyzed in this study, to understand the detailed temporal and spatial characteristics of the UHI in Beijing. The UHI effect in Beijing is significant, with an urban-to-rural temperature difference of up to 8℃ during the winter nighttime. Furthermore, the impacts of UHIs on building design and energy performance were also investigated. The UHI in Beijing led to an approximately 11% increase in cooling load and 16% decrease in heating load in the urban area compared with the rural area, whereas the urban heating peak load decreased 9% and the cooling peak load increased 7% because of the UHI effect. This study provides insights into the UHI in Beijing and recommendations to improve building design and decision-making while considering the urban microclimate.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simona D&#039;Oca</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chien-Fei Chen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ten Questions Concerning Occupant Behavior in Buildings: The Big Picture</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building and Environment</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behavior Modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interdisciplinary</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Occupant behavior has significant impacts on building energy performance and occupant comfort. However, occupant behavior is not well understood and is often oversimplified in the building life cycle, due to its stochastic, diverse, complex, and interdisciplinary nature. The use of simplified methods or tools to quantify the impacts of occupant behavior in building performance simulations significantly contributes to performance gaps between simulated models and actual building energy consumption. Therefore, it is crucial to understand occupant behavior in a comprehensive way, integrating qualitative approaches and data- and model-driven quantitative approaches, and employing appropriate tools to guide the design and operation of low-energy residential and commercial buildings that integrate technological and human dimensions. This paper presents ten questions, highlighting some of the most important issues regarding concepts, applications, and methodologies in occupant behavior research. The proposed questions and answers aim to provide insights into occupant behavior for current and future researchers, designers, and policy makers, and most importantly, to inspire innovative research and applications to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy use in buildings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheng Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingjing An</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">shan Hu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Thorough Assessment of China’s Standard for Energy Consumption of Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">China</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">code and standard</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy consumption</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy efficiency</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Use Intensity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">outcome-based code</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;China’s Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings (the Design Standard) is widely used in the design phase to regulate the energy efficiency of physical assets (envelope, lighting, HVAC) in buildings. However, the standard does not consider many important factors that influence the actual energy use in buildings, and this can lead to gaps between the design estimates and actual energy consumption. To achieve the national energy savings targets defined in the strategic 12&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Five-Year Plan, China developed the first standard for energy consumption of buildings GB/T51161-2016 (the Consumption Standard). This study provides an overview of the Consumption Standard, identifies its strengths and weaknesses, and recommends future improvements. The analysis and discussion of the constraint value and the leading value, two key indicators of the energy use intensity, provide insight into the intent and effectiveness of the Consumption Standard. The results indicated that consistency between China’s Design Standard GB 50189-2015 and the Consumption Standard GB/T51161-2016 could be achieved if the Design Standard used the actual building operations and occupant behavior in calculating the energy use in Chinese buildings. The development of an outcome-based code in the U.S. was discussed in comparison with China’s Consumption Standard, and this revealed the strengths and challenges associated with implementing a new compliance method based on actual energy use in buildings in the U.S. Overall, this study provides important insights into the latest developments of actual consumption-based building energy standards, and this information should be valuable to building designers and energy policy makers in China and the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sarah C. Taylor-Lange</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simona D&#039;Oca</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stefano P. Corgnati</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behavior Modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building design and operation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building performance simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">116</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">694-702</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Occupant behavior is one of the major factors influencing building energy consumption and contributing to uncertainty in building energy use prediction and simulation. Currently the understanding of occupant behavior is insufficient both in building design, operation and retrofit, leading to incorrect simplifications in modeling and analysis. This paper introduced the most recent advances and current obstacles in modeling occupant behavior and quantifying its impact on building energy use. The major themes include advancements in data collection techniques, analytical and modeling methods, and simulation applications which provide insights into behavior energy savings potential and impact. There has been growing research and applications in this field, but significant challenges and opportunities still lie ahead.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-1004497</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xinqiao Yu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dandan Zhu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Comparative Study on Energy Performance of Variable Refrigerant Flow Systems and Variable Air Volume Systems in Office Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Energy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparative analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">field measurement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Variable Air Volume (VAV) Systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Systems</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Variable air volume (VAV) systems and variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems are popularly used in office buildings. This study investigated VAV and VRF systems in five typical office buildings in China, and compared their air conditioning energy use. Site survey and field measurements were conducted to collect data of building characteristics and operation. Measured cooling electricity use was collected from sub-metering in the five buildings. The sub-metering data, normalized by climate and operating hours, show that VRF systems consumed much less air conditioning energy by up to 70% than VAV systems. This is mainly due to the different operation modes of both system types leading to much fewer operating hours of the VRF systems. Building simulation was used to quantify the impact of operation modes of VRF and VAV systems on cooling loads using a prototype office building in China. Simulated results show the VRF operation mode leads to much less cooling loads than the VAV operation mode, by 42% in Hong Kong and 53% in Qingdao. The VRF systems operated in the part-time-part-space mode enabling occupants to turn on air-conditioning only when needed and when spaces were occupied, while the VAV systems operated in the full-time-full-space mode limiting occupants’ control of operation. The findings provide insights into VRF systems operation and controls as well as its energy performance, which can inform HVAC designers on system selection and building operators or facility managers on improving VRF system operations.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaoxin Ren</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data Analysis and Stochastic Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in Large Office Buildings in China</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lighting modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">office buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poisson distribution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stochastic modeling</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">86</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">275-287</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Lighting consumes about 20% to 40% of the total electricity use in large office buildings in China. Commonly in building simulations, static time schedules for typical weekdays, weekends and holidays are assumed to represent the dynamics of lighting energy use in buildings. This approach does not address the stochastic nature of lighting energy use, which can be influenced by occupant behavior in buildings. This study analyzes the main characteristics of lighting energy use over various timescales, based on the statistical analysis of measured lighting energy use data from 15 large office buildings in Beijing and Hong Kong. It was found that in these large office buildings, the 24-hourly variation in lighting energy use was mainly driven by the schedules of the building occupants. Outdoor illuminance levels had little impact on lighting energy use due to the lack of automatic daylighting controls (an effective retrofit measure to reduce lighting energy use) and the relatively small perimeter area exposed to natural daylight. A stochastic lighting energy use model for large office buildings was further developed to represent diverse occupant activities, at six different time periods throughout a day, and also the annual distribution of lighting power across these periods. The model was verified using measured lighting energy use from the 15 buildings. The developed stochastic lighting model can generate more accurate lighting schedules for use in building energy simulations, improving the simulation accuracy of lighting energy use in real buildings.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-180389</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaoxin Ren</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data Mining of Space Heating System Performance in Affordable Housing</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building and Environment</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">affordable housing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">clustering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data mining</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">decision tree</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">space heating</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">89</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-13</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The space heating in residential buildings accounts for a considerable amount of the primary energy use. Therefore, understanding the operation and performance of space heating systems becomes crucial in improving occupant comfort while reducing energy use. This study investigated the behavior of occupants adjusting their thermostat settings and heating system operations in a 62-unit affordable housing complex in Revere, Massachusetts, USA. The data mining methods, including clustering approach and decision trees, were used to ascertain occupant behavior patterns. Data tabulating ON/OFF space heating states was assessed, to provide a better understanding of the intermittent operation of space heating systems in terms of system cycling frequency and the duration of each operation. The decision tree was used to verify the link between room temperature settings, house and heating system characteristics and the heating energy use. The results suggest that the majority of apartments show fairly constant room temperature profiles with limited variations during a day or between weekday and weekend. Data clustering results revealed six typical patterns of room temperature profiles during the heating season. Space heating systems cycled more frequently than anticipated due to a tight range of room thermostat settings and potentially oversized heating capacities. The results from this study affirm data mining techniques are an effective method to analyze large datasets and extract hidden patterns to inform design and improve operations.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-180239</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rongpeng Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ryohei Hinokuma</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shinichi Kasahara</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yoshinori Yura</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Development and validation of a new variable refrigerant flow systemmodel in EnergyPlus</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heat pump</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">model validation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Variable refrigerant flow</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">117</style></volume><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems vary the refrigerant flow to meet the dynamic zone thermalloads, leading to more efficient operations than other system types. This paper introduces a new modelthat simulates the energy performance of VRF systems in the heat pump (HP) operation mode. Com-pared with the current VRF-HP models implemented in EnergyPlus, the new VRF system model has morecomponent models based on physics and thus has significant innovations in: (1) enabling advanced con-trols, including variable evaporating and condensing temperatures in the indoor and outdoor units, andvariable fan speeds based on the temperature and zone load in the indoor units, (2) adding a detailedrefrigerant pipe heat loss calculation using refrigerant flow rate, operational conditions, pipe length, andpipe insulation materials, (3) improving accuracy of simulation especially in partial load conditions, and(4) improving the usability of the model by significantly reducing the number of user input performancecurves. The VRF-HP model is implemented in EnergyPlus and validated with measured data from fieldtests. Results show that the new VRF-HP model provides more accurate estimate of the VRF-HP systemperformance, which is key to determining code compliance credits as well as utilities incentive for VRFtechnologies.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-1004499</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">399</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheng Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Insight into Actual Energy Use and Its Drivers in High-Performance Buildings</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">actual energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building technologies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">driving factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">high-performance buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">integrated design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">performance rating</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Using portfolio analysis and individual detailed case studies, we studied the energy performance and drivers of energy use in 51 high-performance office buildings in the U.S., Europe, China, and other parts of Asia. Portfolio analyses revealed that actual site energy use intensity (EUI) of the study buildings varied by a factor of as much as 11, indicating significant variation in real energy use in HPBs worldwide. Nearly half of the buildings did not meet the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1-2004 energy target, raising questions about whether a building’s certification as high performing accurately indicates that a building is energy efficient and suggesting that improvement in the design and operation of HPBs is needed to realize their energy-saving potential. We studied the influence of climate, building size, and building technologies on building energy performance and found that although all are important, none are decisive factors in building energy use. EUIs were widely scattered in all climate zones. There was a trend toward low energy use in small buildings, but the correlation was not absolute; some small HPBs exhibited high energy use, and some large HPBs exhibited low energy use. We were unable to identify a set of efficient technologies that correlated directly to low EUIs. In two case studies, we investigated the influence of occupant behavior as well as operation and maintenance on energy performance and found that both play significant roles in realizing energy savings. We conclude that no single factor determines the actual energy performance of HPBs, and adding multiple efficient technologies does not necessarily improve building energy performance; therefore, an integrated design approach that takes account of climate, technology, occupant behavior, and operations and maintenance practices should be implemented to maximize energy savings in HPBs. These findings are intended to help architects, engineers, operators, and policy makers improve the design and operation of HPBs.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-180169</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">William O&#039;Brien</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaohang Feng</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">H. Burak Gunay</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farhang Tahmasebi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ardeshir Mahdavi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Occupant Behavior Modeling for Building  Performance Simulation: Current State and Future Challenges</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy efficiency</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">107</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">264-278</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Occupant behavior is now widely recognized as a major contributing factor to uncertainty of building performance. While a surge of research on the topic has occurred over the past four decades, and particularly the past few years, there are many gaps in knowledge and limitations to current methodologies. This paper outlines the state-of-the-art research, current obstacles and future needs and directions for the following four-step iterative process: (1) occupant monitoring and data collection, (2) model development, (3) model evaluation, and (4) model implementation into building simulation tools. Major themes include the need for greater rigor in experimental methodologies; detailed, honest, and candid reporting of methods and results; and development of an efficient means to implement occupant behavior models and integrate them into building energy modeling programs.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-1004504</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaohang Feng</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simulation of Occupancy in Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupancy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">software module</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stochastic modeling</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">87</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">348-359</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Occupants are involved in a variety of activities in buildings, which drive them to move among rooms, enter or leave a building. In this study, occupancy is defined at four levels and varies with time: (1) the number of occupants in a building, (2) occupancy status of a space, (3) the number of occupants in a space, and (4) the space location of an occupant. Occupancy has a great influence on internal loads and ventilation requirement, thus building energy consumption. Based on a comprehensive review and comparison of literature on occupancy modeling, three representative occupancy models, corresponding to the levels 2–4, are selected and implemented in a software module. Main contributions of our study include: (1) new methods to classify occupancy models, (2) the review and selection of various levels of occupancy models, and (3) new methods to integrate these model into a tool that can be used in different ways for different applications and by different audiences. The software can simulate more detailed occupancy in buildings to improve the simulation of energy use, and better evaluate building technologies in buildings. The occupancy of an office building is simulated as an example to demonstrate the use of the software module.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-180424</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheng Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Updates to the China Design Standard for Energy Efficiency  in Public Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy Policy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building energy standard</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">China</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy efficiency</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GB 50189</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public buildings</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">87</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">187-198</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The China Design Standard for Energy Efficiency in public buildings (GB 50189) debuted in 2005 when China completed the 10th Five-Year Plan. GB 50189-2005 played a crucial role in regulating the energy efficiency in Chinese commercial buildings. The standard was recently updated in 2014 to increase energy savings targets by 30% compared with the 2005 standard. This paper reviews the major changes to the standard, including expansion of energy efficiency coverage and more stringent efficiency requirements. The paper also discusses the interrelationship of the design standard with China&#039;s other building energy standards. Furthermore, comparisons are made with ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2013 to provide contrasting differences in efficiency requirements. Finally recommendations are provided to guide the future standard revision, focusing on three areas: (1) increasing efficiency requirements of building envelope and HVAC systems, (2) adding a whole-building performance compliance pathway and implementing a ruleset based automatic code baseline model generation in an effort to reduce the discrepancies of baseline models created by different tools and users, and (3) adding inspection and commissioning requirements to ensure building equipment and systems are installed correctly and operate as designed.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-1004493</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jianjun Xia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Shen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wei Feng</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Le Yang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Piljae Im</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alison Lu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mahabir Bhandari</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparison of Building Energy Use Data Between the United States and China</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy and Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparison</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy benchmarking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy monitoring system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">retrofit</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">78</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">165-175</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Buildings in the United States and China consumed 41% and 28% of the total primary energy in 2011, respectively. Good energy data are the cornerstone to understanding building energy performance and supporting research, design, operation, and policy making for low energy buildings. This paper presents initial outcomes from a joint research project under the U.S.–China Clean Energy Research Center for Building Energy Efficiency. The goal is to decode the driving forces behind the discrepancy of building energy use between the two countries; identify gaps and deficiencies of current building energy monitoring, data collection, and analysis; and create knowledge and tools to collect and analyze good building energy data to provide valuable and actionable information for key stakeholders. This paper first reviews and compares several popular existing building energy monitoring systems in both countries. Next a standard energy data model is presented. A detailed, measured building energy data comparison was conducted for a few office buildings in both countries. Finally issues of data collection, quality, sharing, and analysis methods are discussed. It was found that buildings in both countries performed very differently, had potential for deep energy retrofit, but that different efficiency measures should apply.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6669E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Le Yang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Hill</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wei Feng</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data and Analytics to Inform Energy Retrofit of High Performance Buildings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Energy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Analytics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Energy benchmarking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">High performance buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">retrofit</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elsevier</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">126</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">90-106</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Buildings consume more than one-third of the world’s primary energy. Reducing energy use in buildings with energy efficient technologies is feasible and also driven by energy policies such as energy benchmarking, disclosure, rating, and labeling in both the developed and developing countries. Current energy retrofits focus on the existing building stocks, especially older buildings, but the growing number of new high performance buildings built around the world raises a question that how these buildings perform and whether there are retrofit opportunities to further reduce their energy use. This is a new and unique problem for the building industry. Traditional energy audit or analysis methods are inadequate to look deep into the energy use of the high performance buildings. This study aims to tackle this problem with a new holistic approach powered by building performance data and analytics. First, three types of measured data are introduced, including the time series energy use, building systems operating conditions, and indoor and outdoor environmental parameters. An energy data model based on the ISO Standard 12655 is used to represent the energy use in buildings in a three-level hierarchy. Secondly, a suite of analytics were proposed to analyze energy use and to identify retrofit measures for high performance buildings. The data-driven analytics are based on monitored data at short time intervals, and cover three levels of analysis – energy profiling, benchmarking and diagnostics. Thirdly, the analytics were applied to a high performance building in California to analyze its energy use and identify retrofit opportunities, including: (1) analyzing patterns of major energy end-use categories at various time scales, (2) benchmarking the whole building total energy use as well as major end-uses against its peers, (3) benchmarking the power usage effectiveness for the data center, which is the largest electricity consumer in this building, and (4) diagnosing HVAC equipment using detailed time-series operating data. Finally, a few energy efficiency measures were identified for retrofit, and their energy savings were estimated to be 20% of the whole-building electricity consumption. Based on the analyses, the building manager took a few steps to improve the operation of fans, chillers, and data centers, which will lead to actual energy savings. This study demonstrated that there are energy retrofit opportunities for high performance buildings and detailed measured building performance data and analytics can help identify and estimate energy savings and to inform the decision making during the retrofit process. Challenges of data collection and analytics were also discussed to shape best practice of retrofitting high performance buildings.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheng Li</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Richard C. Diamond</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Siyue Guo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jingyi Wang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Integrated Design for High Performance Buildings</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6991E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiufeng Pang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oren Schetrit</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liping Wang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shinichi Kasahara</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yoshinori Yura</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ryohei Hinokuma</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A New Model to Simulate Energy Performance of VRF Systems</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This paper presents a new model to simulate energy performance of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems in heat pump operation mode (either cooling or heating is provided but not simultaneously). The main improvement of the new model is the introduction of the evaporating and condensing temperature in the indoor and outdoor unit capacity modifier functions. The independent variables in the capacity modifier functions of the existing VRF model in EnergyPlus are mainly room wet-bulb temperature and outdoor dry-bulb temperature in cooling mode and room dry-bulb temperature and outdoor wet-bulb temperature in heating mode. The new approach allows compliance with different specifications of each indoor unit so that the modeling accuracy is improved. The new VRF model was implemented in a custom version of EnergyPlus 7.2. This paper first describes the algorithm for the new VRF model, which is then used to simulate the energy performance of a VRF system in a Prototype House in California that complies with the requirements of Title 24 – the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The VRF system performance is then compared with three other types of HVAC systems: the Title 24-2005 Baseline system, the traditional High Efficiency system, and the EnergyStar Heat Pump system in three typical California climates: Sunnyvale, Pasadena and Fresno. Calculated energy savings from the VRF systems are significant. The HVAC site energy savings range from 51 to 85%, while the TDV (Time Dependent Valuation) energy savings range from 31 to 66% compared to the Title 24 Baseline Systems across the three climates. The largest energy savings are in Fresno climate followed by Sunnyvale and Pasadena. The paper discusses various characteristics of the VRF systems contributing to the energy savings. It should be noted that these savings are calculated using the Title 24 prototype House D under standard operating conditions. Actual performance of the VRF systems for real houses under real operating conditions will vary.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6666E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dandan Zhu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building energy modeling programs comparison Research on HVAC systems simulation part</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building energy modeling programs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparison tests</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HVAC system simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">theory analysis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Building energy simulation programs are effective tools for the evaluation of building energy saving and optimization of design. The fact that large discrepancies exist in simulated results when different BEMPs are used to model the same building has caused wide concern. Urgent research is needed to identify the main elements that contribute towards the simulation results. This technical report summarizes methodologies, processes, and the main assumptions of three building energy modeling programs (BEMPs) for HVAC calculations: EnergyPlus, DeST, and DOE-2.1E, and test cases are designed to analyze the calculation process in detail. This will help users to get a better understanding of BEMPs and the research methodology of building simulation. This will also help build a foundation for building energy code development and energy labeling programs.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wei Feng</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alison Lu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jianjun Xia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Le Yang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qi Shen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Piljae Im</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mahabir Bhandari</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building Energy Monitoring and Analysis</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;U.S. and China are the world&#039;s top two economics. Together they consumed one-third of the world&#039;s primary energy. It is an unprecedented opportunity and challenge for governments, researchers and industries in both countries to join together to address energy issues and global climate change. Such joint collaboration has huge potential in creating new jobs in energy technologies and services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Buildings in the US and China consumed about 40% and 25% of the primary energy in both countries in 2010 respectively. Worldwide, the building sector is the largest contributor to the greenhouse gas emission. Better understanding and improving the energy performance of buildings is a critical step towards sustainable development and mitigation of global climate change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This project aimed to develop a standard methodology for building energy data definition, collection, presentation, and analysis; apply the developed methods to a standardized energy monitoring platform, including hardware and software, to collect and analyze building energy use data; and compile offline statistical data and online real-time data in both countries for fully understanding the current status of building energy use. This helps decode the driving forces behind the discrepancy of building energy use between the two countries; identify gaps and deficiencies of current building energy monitoring, data collection, and analysis; and create knowledge and tools to collect and analyze good building energy data to provide valuable and actionable information for key stakeholders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Key research findings were summarized as follows:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Identified the need for a standard data model and platform to collect, process, analyze, and exchange building performance data due to different definitions of energy use and boundary, difficulty in exchanging data, and lack of current standards.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Compared energy monitoring systems to identify gaps, including iSagy, Pulse Energy, SkySpark, sMap, EPP, ION, and Metasys.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Contributed to develop a standard data model to represent energy use in buildings (ISO standard 12655 and a Chinese national standard)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Determined that buildings in the United States and China are very different in design, operation, maintenance, occupant behavior: U.S. buildings have more stringent comfort standards regarding temperature, ventilation, lighting, and hot-water use and therefore higher internal loads and operating hours, and China buildings having higher lighting energy use, seasonal HVAC operation, more operators, more use of natural ventilation, less outdoor ventilation air, and wider range of comfort temperature.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Completed data collection for six office buildings, one in UC Merced campus, one in Sacramento, one in Berkeley, one in George Tech campus, and two in Beijing.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Compiled a source book of 10 selected buildings in the United States and China with detailed descriptions of the buildings, data points, and monitoring systems, and containing energy analysis of each building and an energy benchmarking among all buildings.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Recognized limited availability of quality data, particularly with long periods of time-interval data, and general lack of value for good data and large datasets.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Compiled a building energy database, with detailed energy end use at 1-hour or 15-minute time interval, of six office buildings — four in the U.S. and two in China. The database is available to the public and is a valuable resource for building research.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Developed methods and used them in data analysis of building performance for the five buildings with adequate data, including energy benchmarking, profiling (daily, weekly, monthly), and diagnostics.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Recommended energy efficiency measures for building retrofit in both countries. U.S. buildings show more potential savings by reducing operation time, reducing plug-loads, expanding comfort temperature range, and turning off lights or equipment when not in use; while Chinese buildings can save energy by increasing lighting system efficiency, and improving envelope insulation and HVAC equipment efficiency.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;The research outputs from the project can help better understand energy performance of buildings, improve building operations to reduce energy waste and increase efficiency, identify retrofit opportunities for existing buildings, and provide guideline to improve the design of new buildings. The standardized energy monitoring and analysis platform as well as the collected real building data can also be used for other CERC projects that need building energy measurements, and be further linked to building energy benchmarking and rating/labeling systems.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6640E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparison of Building Energy Modeling Programs: HVAC Systems</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6432E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xin Zhou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiaoxin Ren</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data Analysis and Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in Large Office Buildings</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy use</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lighting</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupant behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">office buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poisson distribution</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Lighting consumes about 20 to 40% of total electricity use in large office buildings in the U.S. and China. In order to develop better lighting simulation models it is crucial to understand the characteristics of lighting energy use. This paper analyzes the main characteristics of lighting energy use over various time scales, based on the statistical analysis of measured lighting energy use of 17 large office buildings in Beijing and Hong Kong. It was found that the daily 24-hour variations of lighting energy use were mainly driven by the schedule of the building occupants. Outdoor illumination levels have little impact on lighting energy use in large office buildings due to the lack of automatic daylighting controls and relatively small perimeter areas. A stochastic lighting energy use model was developed based on different occupant activities during six time periods throughout a day, and the annual distribution of lighting power across those periods. The model was verified using measured lighting energy use of one selected building. This study demonstrates how statistical analysis and stochastic modeling can be applied to lighting energy use. The developed lighting model can be adopted by building energy modeling programs to improve the simulation accuracy of lighting energy use.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dandan Zhu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chuang Wang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Detailed Loads Comparison of Three Building Energy Modeling Programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building Simulation</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building energy modeling program</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building thermal loads</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparison</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DOE-2.1E</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tsinghua University Press</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">323-335</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Building energy simulation is widely used to help design energy efficient building envelopes and HVAC systems, develop and demonstrate compliance of building energy codes, and implement building energy rating programs. However, large discrepancies exist between simulation results from different building energy modeling programs (BEMPs). This leads many users and stakeholders to lack confidence in the results from BEMPs and building simulation methods. This paper compared the building thermal load modeling capabilities and simulation results of three BEMPs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Test cases, based upon the ASHRAE Standard 140 tests, were designed to isolate and evaluate the key influencing factors responsible for the discrepancies in results between EnergyPlus and DeST. This included the load algorithms and some of the default input parameters. It was concluded that there is little difference between the results from EnergyPlus and DeST if the input values are the same or equivalent despite there being many discrepancies between the heat balance algorithms. DOE-2.1E can produce large errors for cases when adjacent zones have very different conditions, or if a zone is conditioned part-time while adjacent zones are unconditioned. This was due to the lack of a strict zonal heat balance routine in DOE-2.1E, and the steady state handling of heat flow through interior walls and partitions. This comparison study did not produce another test suite, but rather a methodology to design tests that can be used to identify and isolate key influencing factors that drive the building thermal loads, and a process with which to carry them out.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">323</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dandan Zhu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chuang Wang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparative research in building energy modeling programs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">China Annual HVACR Conference</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">advanced building software: energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building energy modeling program</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparison</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">doe-2</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation research group</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">test</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">China (in Chinese)</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shankar Earni</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spencer Woodworth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xiufeng Pang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jorge Hernandez-Maldonado</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rongxin Yin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liping Wang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Steve E. Greenberg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Fiegel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alma Rubalcava</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monitoring-based HVAC Commissioning of an Existing Office Building for Energy Efficiency</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">benchmarking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">commissioning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fault detection and diagnostics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">functional testing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trend data</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The performance of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems may fail to satisfy design expectations due to improper equipment installation, equipment degradation, sensor failures, or incorrect control sequences. Commissioning identifies and implements cost-effective operational and maintenance measures in buildings to bring them up to the design intent or optimum operation. An existing office building is used as a case study to demonstrate the process of commissioning. Building energy benchmarking tools are applied to evaluate the energy performance for screening opportunities at the whole building level. A large natural gas saving potential was indicated by the building benchmarking results. Faulty operations in the HVAC systems, such as improper operations of air-side economizers, simultaneous heating and cooling, and ineffective optimal start, were identified through trend data analyses and functional testing. The energy saving potential for each commissioning measure is quantified with a calibrated building simulation model. An actual energy saving of 10% was realized after the implementations of cost-effective measures.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-5940E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dandan Zhu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chuang Wang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Da Yan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Comparison of DeST and EnergyPlus</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">China HVAC Simulation Conference</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">building simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparison</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation research group</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">test cases</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beijing</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stephen E. Selkowitz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mehry Yazdanian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Assessment of Energy Impact of Window Technologies for Commercial Buildings</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-6035E</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dale A. Sartor</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul A. Mathew</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mehry Yazdanian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparisons of HVAC Simulations between EnergyPlus and DOE-2.2 for data centers</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASHRAE Conference</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data center</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">doe-2</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energyplus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">115 Part 1</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peng Xu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu Joe Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruidong Jin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guoxiong Yang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Measured energy performance of a US-China demonstration energy-efficient commercial building</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007 ASHRAE Winter Meeting, January 27-31, 2007</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2007</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dallas, TX</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;In July 1998, the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) and China&#039;s Ministry of Science of Technology (MOST) signed a Statement of Work (SOW) to collaborate on the design and construction of an energyefficient demonstration office building and design center to be located in Beijing. The proposed 13,000 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; (140,000 ft&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) nine-story office building would use U.S. energy-efficient materials, space-conditioning systems, controls, and design principles that were judged to be widely replicable throughout China. The SOW stated that China would contribute the land and provide for the costs of the base building, while the U.S. would be responsible for the additional (or marginal) costs associated with the package of energy efficiency andrenewable energy improvements to the building. The project was finished and the building occupied in 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using DOE-2 to analyze the energy performance of the as-built building, the building obtained 44 out of 69 possible points according to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating, including the full maximum of 10 points in the energy performance section. The building achieved a LEED Gold rating, the first such LEED-rated office building in China, and is 60% more efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-1999. The utility data from the first year&#039;s operation match well the analysis results, providing that adjustments are made for unexpected changes in occupancy and operations. Compared with similarly equipped office buildings in Beijing, this demonstration building uses 60% less energy per floor area. However, compared to conventional office buildings with less equipment and window air-conditioners, the building uses slightly more energy per floor area.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Simulation Research Group&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-60978</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prajesh Bhattacharya</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saha, S.K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ajay K. Yadav</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrick E. Phelan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ravi S. Prasher</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brownian Dynamics Simulation to Determine the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Applied Physics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">complex fluids</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disperse systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thermal conduction in nonmetallic liquids</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">95</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6492–6494</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;A nanofluid is a fluid containing suspended solid particles, with sizes on the order of nanometers. Normally, nanofluids have higher thermal conductivities than their base fluids. Therefore, it is of interest to predict the effective thermal conductivity of such a nanofluid under different conditions, especially since only limited experimental data are available. We have developed a technique to compute the effective thermal conductivity of a nanofluid using Brownian dynamics simulation, which has the advantage of being computationally less expensive than molecular dynamics, and have coupled that with the equilibrium Green-Kubo method. By comparing the results of our calculation with the available experimental data, we show that our technique predicts the thermal conductivity of nanofluids to a good level of accuracy.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6492</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R. Calhoun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrick E. Phelan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ajay K. Yadav</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prajesh Bhattacharya</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Numerical Tools For Particle- Fluid Interactions</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pulmonary Research Forum: American Lung Association of Arizona &amp; New Mexico</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wangda Zuo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianyi Yang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wenyan Zou</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Updating traditional CRM system by terminal server</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Chongqing University (Natural Science Edition)</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">94-95</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prajesh Bhattacharya</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saha, S.K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ajay K. Yadav</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrick E. Phelan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ravi S. Prasher</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Determining the Effective Thermal Conductivity of a Nanofluid Using Brownian Dynamics Simulation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Heat Transfer Conference</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2003</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Las Vegas, NV</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tuomas Laine</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risto Kosonen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kim Hagström</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Panu Mustakallio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De-Wei Yin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philip Haves</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qingyan Chen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Better IAQ Through Integrating Design Tools For The HVAC Industry</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Healthy Buildings 2000</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2000</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Espoo, Finland</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;There is currently no effective combination of interoperable design tools to cover all critical aspects of the HVAC design process. Existing design tools are separately available, but require expertise and operating time that is beyond the scope of a normal design project. For example, energy analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools are not used in practical design, leading to poor indoor air quality and/or unnecessary energy consumption in buildings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A prototype integrated software tool for demonstration, process mapping and proof-of-concept purposes was developed under a new international, Finland/USA jointly funded development project BildIT. Individual design tools were simplified and adapted to specific applications and also integrated so that they can be used in a timely and effective manner by the designer. The core of the prototype linked together an architectural CAD system, a 3D space model, a CFD program and a building energy simulation program and it utilises real product data from manufacturer&#039;s software. Also the complex building design, construction, maintenance and retrofit processes were mapped to get a template for the structure of the integrated design tool.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-48456</style></custom2></record></records></xml>