<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mary Ann Piette</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tianzhen Hong</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">William J. Fisk</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norman Bourassa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wanyu R. Chan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yixing Chen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">H.Y. Iris Cheung</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toshifumi Hotchi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Margarita Kloss</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sang Hoon Lee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phillip N. Price</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oren Schetrit</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kaiyu Sun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sarah C. Taylor-Lange</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rongpeng Zhang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Small and Medium Building Efficiency Toolkit and Community Demonstration Program</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CBES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">commercial buildings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy efficiency</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy savings</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">indoor air quality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">indoor environmental quality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">outdoor air measurement technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">outdoor airflow intake rate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">retrofit</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ventilation rate</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Small commercial buildings in the United States consume 47 percent of all primary energy consumed in the building sector. Retrofitting small and medium commercial buildings may pose a steep challenge for owners, as many lack the expertise and resources to identify and evaluate cost-effective energy retrofit strategies. To address this problem, this project developed the Commercial Building Energy Saver (CBES), an energy retrofit analysis toolkit that calculates the energy use of a building, identifies and evaluates retrofit measures based on energy savings, energy cost savings, and payback. The CBES Toolkit includes a web app for end users and the CBES Application Programming Interface for integrating CBES with other energy software tools. The toolkit provides a rich feature set, including the following:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Energy Benchmarking providing an Energy Star score&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Load Shape Analysis to identify potential building operation improvements&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Preliminary Retrofit Analysis which uses a custom developed pre-simulated database&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Detailed Retrofit Analysis which utilizes real time EnergyPlus simulations&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a parallel effort the project team developed technologies to measure outdoor airflow rate; commercialization and use would avoid both excess energy use from over ventilation and poor indoor air quality resulting from under ventilation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If CBES is adopted by California’s statewide small office and retail buildings, by 2030 the state can anticipate 1,587 gigawatt hours of electricity savings, 356 megawatts of non-coincident peak demand savings, 30.2 megatherms of natural gas savings, $227 million of energy-related cost savings, and reduction of emissions by 757,866 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. In addition, consultant costs will be reduced in the retrofit analysis process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CBES contributes to the energy savings retrofit field by enabling a straightforward and uncomplicated decision-making process for small and medium business owners and leveraging different levels of assessment to match user background, preference, and data availability.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-2001054</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu Joe Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norman Bourassa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walter F. Buhl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ender Erdem</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Robert J. Hitchcock</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SimBuild 2006</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2006</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, MA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;For the past decade, the non-residential portion of California&#039;s Title-24 building energy standard has relied on &lt;em&gt;DOE-2.1E&lt;/em&gt; as the reference computer simulation program for development as well as compliance. However, starting in 2004, the California Energy Commission has been evaluating the possible use of EnergyPlus as the reference program in future revisions of Title-24. As part of this evaluation, the authors converted the Alternate Compliance Method (ACM) certification test suite of 150 &lt;em&gt;DOE-2&lt;/em&gt; files to &lt;em&gt;EnergyPlus&lt;/em&gt;, and made parallel &lt;em&gt;DOE-2&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;EnergyPlus&lt;/em&gt; runs for this extensive set of test cases. A customized version of &lt;em&gt;DOE-2.1E&lt;/em&gt; named doe2ep was developed to automate the conversion process. This paper describes this conversion process, including the difficulties in establishing an apples-to-apples comparison between the two programs, and summarizes how the &lt;em&gt;DOE-2&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;EnergyPlus&lt;/em&gt; results compare for the ACM test cases.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><call-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-61527</style></call-num><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Simulation Research Group&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-61527</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu Joe Huang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norman Bourassa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walter F. Buhl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ender Erdem</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Robert J. Hitchcock</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 Compliance Calculations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SimBuild 2006</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2006</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, MA, USA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norman Bourassa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philip Haves</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu Joe Huang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Computer Simulation Appraisal of Non-Residential Low Energy Cooling Systems in California</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2002</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Asilomar, California, USA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;An appraisal of the potential performance of different Low Energy Cooling (LEC) systems in nonresidential buildings in California is being conducted using computer simulation. The paper presents results from the first phase of the study, which addressed the systems that can be modeled, with the DOE-2.1E simulation program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following LEC technologies were simulated as variants of a conventional variable-air-volume system with vapor compression cooling and mixing ventilation in the occupied spaces:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Air-side indirect and indirect/direct evaporative pre-cooling&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Cool beams&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Displacement ventilation&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;Results are presented for four populous climates, represented by Oakland, Sacramento, Pasadena and San Diego. The greatest energy savings are obtained from a combination of displacement ventilation and air-side indirect/direct evaporative pre-cooling. Cool beam systems have the lowest peak demand but do not reduce energy consumption significantly because the reduction in fan energy is offset by a reduction in air-side free cooling. Overall, the results indicate significant opportunities for LEC  technologies to reduce energy consumption and demand in non-residential  new construction and retrofit.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LBNL-50677</style></custom2></record></records></xml>