TY - RPRT T1 - Small and Medium Building Efficiency Toolkit and Community Demonstration Program Y1 - 2017 A1 - Mary Ann Piette A1 - Tianzhen Hong A1 - William J. Fisk A1 - Norman Bourassa A1 - Wanyu R. Chan A1 - Yixing Chen A1 - H.Y. Iris Cheung A1 - Toshifumi Hotchi A1 - Margarita Kloss A1 - Sang Hoon Lee A1 - Phillip N. Price A1 - Oren Schetrit A1 - Kaiyu Sun A1 - Sarah C. Taylor-Lange A1 - Rongpeng Zhang KW - CBES KW - commercial buildings KW - energy efficiency KW - energy modeling KW - energy savings KW - indoor air quality KW - indoor environmental quality KW - outdoor air measurement technology KW - outdoor airflow intake rate KW - retrofit KW - ventilation rate AB -

Small commercial buildings in the United States consume 47 percent of all primary energy consumed in the building sector. Retrofitting small and medium commercial buildings may pose a steep challenge for owners, as many lack the expertise and resources to identify and evaluate cost-effective energy retrofit strategies. To address this problem, this project developed the Commercial Building Energy Saver (CBES), an energy retrofit analysis toolkit that calculates the energy use of a building, identifies and evaluates retrofit measures based on energy savings, energy cost savings, and payback. The CBES Toolkit includes a web app for end users and the CBES Application Programming Interface for integrating CBES with other energy software tools. The toolkit provides a rich feature set, including the following:

  1. Energy Benchmarking providing an Energy Star score
  2. Load Shape Analysis to identify potential building operation improvements
  3. Preliminary Retrofit Analysis which uses a custom developed pre-simulated database
  4. Detailed Retrofit Analysis which utilizes real time EnergyPlus simulations

In a parallel effort the project team developed technologies to measure outdoor airflow rate; commercialization and use would avoid both excess energy use from over ventilation and poor indoor air quality resulting from under ventilation.

If CBES is adopted by California’s statewide small office and retail buildings, by 2030 the state can anticipate 1,587 gigawatt hours of electricity savings, 356 megawatts of non-coincident peak demand savings, 30.2 megatherms of natural gas savings, $227 million of energy-related cost savings, and reduction of emissions by 757,866 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. In addition, consultant costs will be reduced in the retrofit analysis process.

CBES contributes to the energy savings retrofit field by enabling a straightforward and uncomplicated decision-making process for small and medium business owners and leveraging different levels of assessment to match user background, preference, and data availability.

U2 - LBNL-2001054 ER - TY - Generic T1 - Green, Clean, & Mean: Pushing the Energy Envelope in Tech Industry Buildings Y1 - 2015 A1 - Evan Mills A1 - Jessica Granderson A1 - Wanyu R. Chan A1 - Richard C. Diamond A1 - Philip Haves A1 - Bruce Nordman A1 - Paul A. Mathew A1 - Mary Ann Piette A1 - Gerald Robinson A1 - Stephen E. Selkowitz AB -

When it comes to innovation in energy and building performance, one can expect leading-edge activity from the technology sector. As front-line innovators in design, materials science, and information management, developing and operating high-performance buildings is a natural extension of their core business.

The energy choices made by technology companies have broad importance given their influence on society at large as well as the extent of their own energy footprint. Microsoft, for example, has approximately 250 facilities around the world (30 million square feet of floor area), with significant aggregate energy use of approximately 4 million kilowatt-hours per day.

There is a degree of existing documentation of efforts to design, build, and operate facilities in the technology sector. However, the material is fragmented and typically looks only at a single company, or discrete projects within a company.Yet, there is no single resource for corporate planners and decision makers that takes stock of the opportunities and documents sector-specific case studies in a structured manner. This report seeks to fill that gap, doing so through a combination of generalized technology assessments (“Key Strategies”) and case studies (“Flagship Projects”).

PB - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory U2 - LBNL-1005070E ER -