02500nas a2200253   4500008003900000022003900039245010600078210006900184260003900253300001200292490000600304520167200310653003701982653002702019653001502046653000902061653001302070653001502083100001602098700001902114700001202133700001702145856008402162       2013                          d  aPrint: 1996-3599; Online 1996-874400aA Detailed Loads Comparison of Three Building Energy Modeling Programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E0 aDetailed Loads Comparison of Three Building Energy Modeling Prog  bTsinghua University Pressc09/2013  a323-3350 v63 a<p>Building energy simulation is widely used to help design energy efficient building envelopes and HVAC systems, develop and demonstrate compliance of building energy codes, and implement building energy rating programs. However, large discrepancies exist between simulation results from different building energy modeling programs (BEMPs). This leads many users and stakeholders to lack confidence in the results from BEMPs and building simulation methods. This paper compared the building thermal load modeling capabilities and simulation results of three BEMPs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Test cases, based upon the ASHRAE Standard 140 tests, were designed to isolate and evaluate the key influencing factors responsible for the discrepancies in results between EnergyPlus and DeST. This included the load algorithms and some of the default input parameters. It was concluded that there is little difference between the results from EnergyPlus and DeST if the input values are the same or equivalent despite there being many discrepancies between the heat balance algorithms. DOE-2.1E can produce large errors for cases when adjacent zones have very different conditions, or if a zone is conditioned part-time while adjacent zones are unconditioned. This was due to the lack of a strict zonal heat balance routine in DOE-2.1E, and the steady state handling of heat flow through interior walls and partitions. This comparison study did not produce another test suite, but rather a methodology to design tests that can be used to identify and isolate key influencing factors that drive the building thermal loads, and a process with which to carry them out.</p>10abuilding energy modeling program10abuilding thermal loads10acomparison10adest10aDOE-2.1E10aenergyplus1 aZhu, Dandan1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aYan, Da1 aWang, Chuang  uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/detailed-loads-comparison-three