02860nas a2200253 4500008004100000022001300041245017500054210006900229260001200298300001400310490000800324520184700332653002402179653000902203653002902212653002602241100001602267700001502283700001802298700002202316700002002338700001502358856023302373 2019 eng d a0306261900aPractical factors of envelope model setup and their effects on the performance of model predictive control for building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems0 aPractical factors of envelope model setup and their effects on t c02/2019 a410 - 4250 v2363 a

Model predictive control (MPC) for buildings is attracting significant attention in research and industry due to its potential to address a number of challenges facing the building industry, including energy cost reduction, grid integration, and occupant connectivity. However, the strategy has not yet been implemented at any scale, largely due to the significant effort required to configure and calibrate the model used in the MPC controller. While many studies have focused on methods to expedite model configuration and improve model accuracy, few have studied the impact a wide range of factors have on the accuracy of the resulting model. In addition, few have continued on to analyze these factors' impact on MPC controller performance in terms of final operating costs. Therefore, this study first identifies the practical factors affecting model setup, specifically focusing on the thermal envelope. The seven that are identified are building design, model structure, model order, data set, data quality, identification algorithm and initial guesses, and software tool-chain. Then, through a large number of trials, it analyzes each factor's influence on model accuracy, focusing on grey-box models for a single zone building envelope. Finally, this study implements a subset of the models identified with these factor variations in heating, ventilating, and air conditioning MPC controllers, and tests them in simulation of a representative case that aims to optimally cool a single-zone building with time-varying electricity prices. It is found that a difference of up to 20% in cooling cost for the cases studied can occur between the best performing model and the worst performing model. The primary factors attributing to this were model structure and initial parameter guesses during parameter estimation of the model.

10abuilding simulation10ahvac10aModel predictive control10aSystem identification1 aBlum, David1 aArendt, K.1 aRivalin, Lisa1 aPiette, Mary, Ann1 aWetter, Michael1 aVeje, C.T. uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261918318099https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0306261918318099?httpAccept=text/xmlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0306261918318099?httpAccept=text/plain02188nas a2200301 4500008004100000245011100041210006900152260001600221520124300237653001701480653002401497653002901521653002501550100001601575700002001591700001501611700001401626700001901640700001601659700001501675700002001690700001801710700001801728700002001746700002001766700001801786856008201804 2019 eng d00aPrototyping the BOPTEST Framework for Simulation-Based Testing of Advanced Control Strategies in Buildings0 aPrototyping the BOPTEST Framework for SimulationBased Testing of aRome, Italy3 a

Advanced control strategies are becoming increasingly necessary in buildings in order to meet and balance requirements for energy efficiency, demand flexibility, and occupant comfort. Additional development and widespread adoption of emerging control strategies, however, ultimately require low implementation costs to reduce payback period and verified performance to gain control vendor, building owner, and operator trust. This is difficult in an already first-cost driven and risk-averse industry. Recent innovations in building simulation can significantly aid in meeting these requirements and spurring innovation at early stages of development by evaluating performance, comparing state-of-the-art to new strategies, providing installation experience, and testing controller implementations. This paper presents the development of a simulation framework consisting of test cases and software platform for the testing of advanced control strategies (BOPTEST - Building Optimization Performance Test). The objectives and requirements of the framework, components of a test case, and proposed software platform architecture are described, and the framework is demonstrated with a prototype implementation and example test case.

10abenchmarking10abuilding simulation10aModel predictive control10asoftware development1 aBlum, David1 aJorissen, Filip1 aHuang, Sen1 aChen, Yan1 aArroyo, Javier1 aBenne, Kyle1 aLi, Yanfei1 aGavan, Valentin1 aRivalin, Lisa1 aHelsen, Lieve1 aVrabie, Draguna1 aWetter, Michael1 aSofos, Marina uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/prototyping-boptest-framework02081nas a2200217 4500008004100000245010200041210006900143490000800212520134200220653002201562653002401584653003301608653001901641653002201660653002201682100002101704700001501725700001901740700002201759856008201781 2018 eng d00aQuantifying the benefits of a building retrofit using an integrated system approach: A case study0 aQuantifying the benefits of a building retrofit using an integra0 v1593 a

Building retrofits provide a large opportunity to significantly reduce energy consumption in the buildings sector. Traditional building retrofits focus on equipment upgrades, often at the end of equipment life or failure, and result in replacement with marginally improved similar technology and limited energy savings. The Integrated System (IS) retrofit approach enables much greater energy savings by leveraging interactive effects between end use systems, enabling downsized or lower energy technologies. This paper presents a case study in Hawaii quantifying the benefits of an IS retrofit approach compared to two traditional retrofit approaches: a Standard Practice of upgrading equipment to meet minimum code requirements, and an Improved Practice of upgrading equipment to a higher efficiency. The IS approach showed an energy savings of 84% over existing building energy use, much higher than the traditional approaches of 13% and 33%. The IS retrofit also demonstrated the greatest energy cost savings potential. While the degree of savings realized from the IS approach will vary by building and climate, these findings indicate that savings on the order of 50% and greater are not possible without an IS approach. It is therefore recommended that the IS approach be universally adopted to achieve deep energy savings.

10aBuilding retrofit10abuilding simulation10aEnergy conservation measures10aenergy savings10aintegrated design10aintegrated system1 aRegnier, Cynthia1 aSun, Kaiyu1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aPiette, Mary, Ann uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/quantifying-benefits-building02060nas a2200265 4500008004100000245011700041210006900158260001200227300001200239490000800251520123400259653002401493653002401517653001501541653002501556653001801581653001701599100001401616700001201630700001901642700001501661700001401676700001401690856009001704 2017 eng d00aComparison of typical year and multiyear building simulations using a 55-year actual weather data set from China0 aComparison of typical year and multiyear building simulations us c06/2017 a890-9040 v1953 a

Weather has significant impacts on the thermal environment and energy use in buildings. Thus, accurate weather data are crucial for building performance evaluations. Traditionally, typical year data inputs are used to represent long-term weather data. However, there is no guarantee that a single year represents the changing climate well. In this study, the long-term representation of a typical year was assessed by comparing it to a 55-year actual weather data set. To investigate the weather impact on building energy use, 559 simulation runs of a prototype office building were performed for 10 large cities covering all climate zones in China. The analysis results demonstrated that the weather data varied significantly from year to year. Hence, a typical year cannot reflect the variation range of weather fluctuations. Typical year simulations overestimated or underestimated the energy use and peak load in many cases. With the increase in computational power of personal computers, it is feasible and essential to adopt multiyear simulations for full assessments of long-term building performance, as this will improve decision-making by allowing for the full consideration of variations in building energy use.

10aActual weather data10abuilding simulation10aenergy use10aMultiyear simulation10aPeak load  10aTypical year1 aCui, Ying1 aYan, Da1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aXiao, Chan1 aLuo, Xuan1 aZhang, Qi uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/comparison-typical-year-and-multiyear02483nas a2200241 4500008004100000245008900041210006900130260001200199300001400211490000700225520173000232653002201962653002501984653002402009653001502033653002202048653001802070100001702088700001502105700001902120700001402139856008802153 2017 eng d00aSimulation and visualization of energy-related occupant behavior in office buildings0 aSimulation and visualization of energyrelated occupant behavior  c03/2017 a785–7980 v103 a

In current building performance simulation programs, occupant presence and interactions with building systems are over-simplified and less indicative of real world scenarios, contributing to the discrepancies between simulated and actual energy use in buildings. Simulation results are normally presented using various types of charts. However, using those charts, it is difficult to visualize and communicate the importance of occupants’ behavior to building energy performance. This study introduced a new approach to simulating and visualizing energy-related occupant behavior in office buildings. First, the Occupancy Simulator was used to simulate the occupant presence and movement and generate occupant schedules for each space as well as for each occupant. Then an occupant behavior functional mockup unit (obFMU) was used to model occupant behavior and analyze their impact on building energy use through co-simulation with EnergyPlus. Finally, an agent-based model built upon AnyLogic was applied to visualize the simulation results of the occupant movement and interactions with building systems, as well as the related energy performance. A case study using a small office building in Miami, FL was presented to demonstrate the process and application of the Occupancy Simulator, the obFMU and EnergyPlus, and the AnyLogic module in simulation and visualization of energy-related occupant behaviors in office buildings. The presented approach provides a new detailed and visual way for policy makers, architects, engineers and building operators to better understand occupant energy behavior and their impact on energy use in buildings, which can improve the design and operation of low energy buildings.

10aBehavior Modeling10abuilding performance10abuilding simulation10aenergyplus10aoccupant behavior10avisualization1 aChen, Yixing1 aLiang, Xin1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aLuo, Xuan uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/simulation-and-visualization-energy01990nas a2200205 4500008004100000245007700041210006900118520131200187653002201499653002501521653002401546653001501570653002201585653002201607100001901629700001201648700001801660700002001678856008601698 2017 eng d00aTen Questions Concerning Occupant Behavior in Buildings: The Big Picture0 aTen Questions Concerning Occupant Behavior in Buildings The Big 3 a

Occupant behavior has significant impacts on building energy performance and occupant comfort. However, occupant behavior is not well understood and is often oversimplified in the building life cycle, due to its stochastic, diverse, complex, and interdisciplinary nature. The use of simplified methods or tools to quantify the impacts of occupant behavior in building performance simulations significantly contributes to performance gaps between simulated models and actual building energy consumption. Therefore, it is crucial to understand occupant behavior in a comprehensive way, integrating qualitative approaches and data- and model-driven quantitative approaches, and employing appropriate tools to guide the design and operation of low-energy residential and commercial buildings that integrate technological and human dimensions. This paper presents ten questions, highlighting some of the most important issues regarding concepts, applications, and methodologies in occupant behavior research. The proposed questions and answers aim to provide insights into occupant behavior for current and future researchers, designers, and policy makers, and most importantly, to inspire innovative research and applications to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy use in buildings.

 

10aBehavior Modeling10abuilding performance10abuilding simulation10aenergy use10ainterdisciplinary10aoccupant behavior1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aYan, Da1 aD'Oca, Simona1 aChen, Chien-Fei uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/ten-questions-concerning-occupant02436nas a2200217 4500008004100000245013500041210006900176520163000245653002401875653002501899653002301924653002201947653003801969653004402007100001602051700001202067700001502079700001902094700001602113856008902129 2016 eng d00aA Comparative Study on Energy Performance of Variable Refrigerant Flow Systems and Variable Air Volume Systems in Office Buildings0 aComparative Study on Energy Performance of Variable Refrigerant 3 a

Variable air volume (VAV) systems and variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems are popularly used in office buildings. This study investigated VAV and VRF systems in five typical office buildings in China, and compared their air conditioning energy use. Site survey and field measurements were conducted to collect data of building characteristics and operation. Measured cooling electricity use was collected from sub-metering in the five buildings. The sub-metering data, normalized by climate and operating hours, show that VRF systems consumed much less air conditioning energy by up to 70% than VAV systems. This is mainly due to the different operation modes of both system types leading to much fewer operating hours of the VRF systems. Building simulation was used to quantify the impact of operation modes of VRF and VAV systems on cooling loads using a prototype office building in China. Simulated results show the VRF operation mode leads to much less cooling loads than the VAV operation mode, by 42% in Hong Kong and 53% in Qingdao. The VRF systems operated in the part-time-part-space mode enabling occupants to turn on air-conditioning only when needed and when spaces were occupied, while the VAV systems operated in the full-time-full-space mode limiting occupants’ control of operation. The findings provide insights into VRF systems operation and controls as well as its energy performance, which can inform HVAC designers on system selection and building operators or facility managers on improving VRF system operations.    


 

 

10abuilding simulation10acomparative analysis10aenergy performance10afield measurement10aVariable Air Volume (VAV) Systems10aVariable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Systems1 aYu, Xinqiao1 aYan, Da1 aSun, Kaiyu1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aZhu, Dandan uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/comparative-study-energy-performance02261nas a2200241 4500008003900000245011100039210006900150260001200219520144900231653002401680653003201704653002001736653001501756653003101771653001301802100002001815700001901835700002201854700001701876700001701893700002801910856008101938 2015 d00aAccelerating the energy retrofit of commercial buildings using a database of energy efficiency performance0 aAccelerating the energy retrofit of commercial buildings using a c07/20153 a

Small and medium-sized commercial buildings can be retrofitted to significantly reduce their energy use, however it is a huge challenge as owners usually lack of the expertise and resources to conduct detailed on-site energy audit to identify and evaluate cost-effective energy technologies. This study presents a DEEP (database of energy efficiency performance) that provides a direct resource for quick retrofit analysis of commercial buildings. DEEP, compiled from the results of about ten million EnergyPlus simulations, enables an easy screening of ECMs (energy conservation measures) and retrofit analysis. The simulations utilize prototype models representative of small and mid-size offices and retails in California climates. In the formulation of DEEP, large scale EnergyPlus simulations were conducted on high performance computing clusters to evaluate hundreds of individual and packaged ECMs covering envelope, lighting, heating, ventilation, air-conditioning, plug-loads, and service hot water. The architecture and simulation environment to create DEEP is flexible and can expand to cover additional building types, additional climates, and new ECMs. In this study DEEP is integrated into a web-based retrofit toolkit, the Commercial Building Energy Saver, which provides a platform for energy retrofit decision making by querying DEEP and unearthing recommended ECMs, their estimated energy savings and financial payback.

10abuilding simulation10aEnergy conservation measure10aenergy modeling10aenergyplus10aHigh Performance computing10aretrofit1 aLee, Sang, Hoon1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aPiette, Mary, Ann1 aSawaya, Geof1 aChen, Yixing1 aTaylor-Lange, Sarah, C. uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/accelerating-energy-retrofit02384nas a2200253 4500008003900000245010000039210006900139260001200208300001200220490000700232520158600239653002401825653001501849653002201864653002201886653002101908653002501929653002401954100001401978700001201992700001902004700001702023856009002040 2015 d00aData Analysis and Stochastic Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in Large Office Buildings in China0 aData Analysis and Stochastic Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in  c01/2015 a275-2870 v863 a

Lighting consumes about 20% to 40% of the total electricity use in large office buildings in China. Commonly in building simulations, static time schedules for typical weekdays, weekends and holidays are assumed to represent the dynamics of lighting energy use in buildings. This approach does not address the stochastic nature of lighting energy use, which can be influenced by occupant behavior in buildings. This study analyzes the main characteristics of lighting energy use over various timescales, based on the statistical analysis of measured lighting energy use data from 15 large office buildings in Beijing and Hong Kong. It was found that in these large office buildings, the 24-hourly variation in lighting energy use was mainly driven by the schedules of the building occupants. Outdoor illuminance levels had little impact on lighting energy use due to the lack of automatic daylighting controls (an effective retrofit measure to reduce lighting energy use) and the relatively small perimeter area exposed to natural daylight. A stochastic lighting energy use model for large office buildings was further developed to represent diverse occupant activities, at six different time periods throughout a day, and also the annual distribution of lighting power across these periods. The model was verified using measured lighting energy use from the 15 buildings. The developed stochastic lighting model can generate more accurate lighting schedules for use in building energy simulations, improving the simulation accuracy of lighting energy use in real buildings.

10abuilding simulation10aenergy use10aLighting modeling10aoccupant behavior10aoffice buildings10aPoisson distribution10astochastic modeling1 aZhou, Xin1 aYan, Da1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aRen, Xiaoxin uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/data-analysis-and-stochastic-modeling02285nas a2200241 4500008003900000245007400039210006900113260001200182300000900194490000700203520156400210653002301774653002401797653001501821653001601836653001801852653002201870653001801892100001701910700001201927700001901939856008501958 2015 d00aData Mining of Space Heating System Performance in Affordable Housing0 aData Mining of Space Heating System Performance in Affordable Ho c07/2015 a1-130 v893 a

The space heating in residential buildings accounts for a considerable amount of the primary energy use. Therefore, understanding the operation and performance of space heating systems becomes crucial in improving occupant comfort while reducing energy use. This study investigated the behavior of occupants adjusting their thermostat settings and heating system operations in a 62-unit affordable housing complex in Revere, Massachusetts, USA. The data mining methods, including clustering approach and decision trees, were used to ascertain occupant behavior patterns. Data tabulating ON/OFF space heating states was assessed, to provide a better understanding of the intermittent operation of space heating systems in terms of system cycling frequency and the duration of each operation. The decision tree was used to verify the link between room temperature settings, house and heating system characteristics and the heating energy use. The results suggest that the majority of apartments show fairly constant room temperature profiles with limited variations during a day or between weekday and weekend. Data clustering results revealed six typical patterns of room temperature profiles during the heating season. Space heating systems cycled more frequently than anticipated due to a tight range of room thermostat settings and potentially oversized heating capacities. The results from this study affirm data mining techniques are an effective method to analyze large datasets and extract hidden patterns to inform design and improve operations.

10aaffordable housing10abuilding simulation10aclustering10adata mining10adecision tree10aoccupant behavior10aspace heating1 aRen, Xiaoxin1 aYan, Da1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/data-mining-space-heating-system02134nas a2200253 4500008003900000245009200039210006900131260001100200490000800211520133600219653002401555653002001579653001501599653001401614653002101628653003001649100001901679700001501698700002001713700002101733700002301754700002001777856008301797 2015 d00aDevelopment and validation of a new variable refrigerant flow systemmodel in EnergyPlus0 aDevelopment and validation of a new variable refrigerant flow sy c9/20150 v1173 a

Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems vary the refrigerant flow to meet the dynamic zone thermalloads, leading to more efficient operations than other system types. This paper introduces a new modelthat simulates the energy performance of VRF systems in the heat pump (HP) operation mode. Com-pared with the current VRF-HP models implemented in EnergyPlus, the new VRF system model has morecomponent models based on physics and thus has significant innovations in: (1) enabling advanced con-trols, including variable evaporating and condensing temperatures in the indoor and outdoor units, andvariable fan speeds based on the temperature and zone load in the indoor units, (2) adding a detailedrefrigerant pipe heat loss calculation using refrigerant flow rate, operational conditions, pipe length, andpipe insulation materials, (3) improving accuracy of simulation especially in partial load conditions, and(4) improving the usability of the model by significantly reducing the number of user input performancecurves. The VRF-HP model is implemented in EnergyPlus and validated with measured data from fieldtests. Results show that the new VRF-HP model provides more accurate estimate of the VRF-HP systemperformance, which is key to determining code compliance credits as well as utilities incentive for VRFtechnologies.

10abuilding simulation10aenergy modeling10aenergyplus10aHeat pump10amodel validation10aVariable refrigerant flow1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aSun, Kaiyu1 aZhang, Rongpeng1 aHinokuma, Ryohei1 aKasahara, Shinichi1 aYura, Yoshinori uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/development-and-validation-new02039nas a2200217 4500008003900000245007300039210006900112260001200181300001200193490000700205520135500212653002301567653002401590653001601614653002301630653002201653653002001675100001801695700001901713856008901732 2015 d00aOccupancy Schedules Learning Process Through a Data Mining Framework0 aOccupancy Schedules Learning Process Through a Data Mining Frame c02/2015 a395-4080 v883 a

Building occupancy is a paramount factor in building energy simulations. Specifically, lighting, plug loads, HVAC equipment utilization, fresh air requirements and internal heat gain or loss greatly depends on the level of occupancy within a building. Developing the appropriate methodologies to describe and reproduce the intricate network responsible for human-building interactions are needed. Extrapolation of patterns from big data streams is a powerful analysis technique which will allow for a better understanding of energy usage in buildings. A three-step data mining framework is applied to discover occupancy patterns in office spaces. First, a data set of 16 offices with 10 min interval occupancy data, over a two year period is mined through a decision tree model which predicts the occupancy presence. Then a rule induction algorithm is used to learn a pruned set of rules on the results from the decision tree model. Finally, a cluster analysis is employed in order to obtain consistent patterns of occupancy schedules. The identified occupancy rules and schedules are representative as four archetypal working profiles that can be used as input to current building energy modeling programs, such as EnergyPlus or IDA-ICE, to investigate impact of occupant presence on design, operation and energy use in office buildings.

10aBehavioral Pattern10abuilding simulation10adata mining10aOccupancy schedule10aoccupant behavior10aOffice Building1 aD'Oca, Simona1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/occupancy-schedules-learning-process01728nas a2200265 4500008003900000245010500039210006900144260001200213300001200225490000800237520089300245653002401138653002201162653002001184653001501204653002201219100001201241700002101253700001901274700001901293700001701312700002301329700002201352856008801374 2015 d00aOccupant Behavior Modeling for Building Performance Simulation: Current State and Future Challenges0 aOccupant Behavior Modeling for Building Performance Simulation C c11/2015 a264-2780 v1073 a

Occupant behavior is now widely recognized as a major contributing factor to uncertainty of building performance. While a surge of research on the topic has occurred over the past four decades, and particularly the past few years, there are many gaps in knowledge and limitations to current methodologies. This paper outlines the state-of-the-art research, current obstacles and future needs and directions for the following four-step iterative process: (1) occupant monitoring and data collection, (2) model development, (3) model evaluation, and (4) model implementation into building simulation tools. Major themes include the need for greater rigor in experimental methodologies; detailed, honest, and candid reporting of methods and results; and development of an efficient means to implement occupant behavior models and integrate them into building energy modeling programs.

10abuilding simulation10aenergy efficiency10aenergy modeling10aenergy use10aoccupant behavior1 aYan, Da1 aO'Brien, William1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aFeng, Xiaohang1 aGunay, Burak1 aTahmasebi, Farhang1 aMahdavi, Ardeshir uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/occupant-behavior-modeling-building02313nas a2200265 4500008003900000245014200039210006900181260001200250300001200262490000700274520142200281653003201703653002401735653002001759653001001779653002201789653001501811100001901826700001801845700002801863700002701891700001701918700002601935856008601961 2015 d00aAn Ontology to Represent Energy-Related Occupant Behavior in Buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema0 aOntology to Represent EnergyRelated Occupant Behavior in Buildin c08/2015 a196-2050 v943 a

Energy-related occupant behavior in buildings is difficult to define and quantify, yet critical to our understanding of total building energy consumption. Part I of this two-part paper introduced the DNAS (Drivers, Needs, Actions and Systems) framework, to standardize the description of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II of this paper implements the DNAS framework into an XML (eXtensible Markup Language) schema, titled ‘occupant behavior XML’ (obXML). The obXML schema is used for the practical implementation of the DNAS framework into building simulation tools. The topology of the DNAS framework implemented in the obXML schema has a main root element OccupantBehavior, linking three main elements representing Buildings, Occupants and Behaviors. Using the schema structure, the actions of turning on an air conditioner and closing blinds provide two examples of how the schema standardizes these actions using XML. The obXML schema has inherent flexibility to represent numerous, diverse and complex types of occupant behaviors in buildings, and it can also be expanded to encompass new types of behaviors. The implementation of the DNAS framework into the obXML schema will facilitate the development of occupant information modeling (OIM) by providing interoperability between occupant behavior models and building energy modeling programs.

10abuilding energy consumption10abuilding simulation10aenergy modeling10aobXML10aoccupant behavior10aXML schema1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aD'Oca, Simona1 aTaylor-Lange, Sarah, C.1 aTurner, William, J. N.1 aChen, Yixing1 aCorgnati, Stefano, P. uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/ontology-represent-energy-related01903nas a2200229 4500008003900000245004100039210004100080260001200121300001200133490000700145520126600152653002401418653001801442653001401460653002201474653002001496653002401516100001901540700001201559700001901571856008301590 2015 d00aSimulation of Occupancy in Buildings0 aSimulation of Occupancy in Buildings c01/2015 a348-3590 v873 a

Occupants are involved in a variety of activities in buildings, which drive them to move among rooms, enter or leave a building. In this study, occupancy is defined at four levels and varies with time: (1) the number of occupants in a building, (2) occupancy status of a space, (3) the number of occupants in a space, and (4) the space location of an occupant. Occupancy has a great influence on internal loads and ventilation requirement, thus building energy consumption. Based on a comprehensive review and comparison of literature on occupancy modeling, three representative occupancy models, corresponding to the levels 2–4, are selected and implemented in a software module. Main contributions of our study include: (1) new methods to classify occupancy models, (2) the review and selection of various levels of occupancy models, and (3) new methods to integrate these model into a tool that can be used in different ways for different applications and by different audiences. The software can simulate more detailed occupancy in buildings to improve the simulation of energy use, and better evaluate building technologies in buildings. The occupancy of an office building is simulated as an example to demonstrate the use of the software module.

10abuilding simulation10aco-simulation10aoccupancy10aoccupant behavior10asoftware module10astochastic modeling1 aFeng, Xiaohang1 aYan, Da1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/simulation-occupancy-buildings02296nas a2200193 4500008003900000245011200039210006900151520161300220653002401833653002401857653002201881653002201903653002301925653002401948100001501972700001901987700001502006856008102021 2014 d00aStochastic Modeling of Overtime Occupancy and Its Application in Building Energy Simulation and Calibration0 aStochastic Modeling of Overtime Occupancy and Its Application in3 a

Overtime is a common phenomenon around the world. Overtime drives both internal heat gains from occupants, lighting and plug-loads, and HVAC operation during overtime periods. Overtime leads to longer occupancy hours and extended operation of building services systems beyond normal working hours, thus overtime impacts total building energy use. Current literature lacks methods to model overtime occupancy because overtime is stochastic in nature and varies by individual occupants and by time. To address this gap in the literature, this study aims to develop a new stochastic model based on the statistical analysis of measured overtime occupancy data from an office building. A binomial distribution is used to represent the total number of occupants working overtime, while an exponential distribution is used to represent the duration of overtime periods. The overtime model is used to generate overtime occupancy schedules as an input to the energy model of a second office building. The measured and simulated cooling energy use during the overtime period is compared in order to validate the overtime model. A hybrid approach to energy model calibration is proposed and tested, which combines ASHRAE Guideline 14 for the calibration of the energy model during normal working hours, and a proposed KS test for the calibration of the energy model during overtime. The developed stochastic overtime model and the hybrid calibration approach can be used in building energy simulations to improve the accuracy of results, and better understand the characteristics of overtime in office buildings.

10abuilding energy use10abuilding simulation10amodel calibration10aoccupant behavior10aovertime occupancy10astochastic modeling1 aSun, Kaiyu1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aGuo, Siyue uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/stochastic-modeling-overtime02814nas a2200169 4500008003900000245008800039210006900127520221500196653002402411653002202435653001402457653002202471653001502493100002702508700001902535856009002554 2014 d00aA Technical Framework to Describe Occupant Behavior for Building Energy Simulations0 aTechnical Framework to Describe Occupant Behavior for Building E3 a

Green buildings that fail to meet expected design performance criteria indicate that technology alone does not guarantee high performance. Human influences are quite often simplified and ignored in the design, construction, and operation of buildings. Energy-conscious human behavior has been demonstrated to be a significant positive factor for improving the indoor environment while reducing the energy use of buildings. In our study we developed a new technical framework to describe energy-related human behavior in buildings. The energy-related behavior includes accounting for individuals and groups of occupants and their interactions with building energy services systems, appliances and facilities. The technical framework consists of four key components:

  1. the drivers behind energy-related occupant behavior, which are biological, societal, environmental, physical, and economical in nature
  2. the needs of the occupants are based on satisfying criteria that are either physical (e.g. thermal, visual and acoustic comfort) or non-physical (e.g. entertainment, privacy, and social reward)
  3. the actions that building occupants perform when their needs are not fulfilled
  4. the systems with which an occupant can interact to satisfy their needs

The technical framework aims to provide a standardized description of a complete set of human energy-related behaviors in the form of an XML schema. For each type of behavior (e.g., occupants opening/closing windows, switching on/off lights etc.) we identify a set of common behaviors based on a literature review, survey data, and our own field study and analysis. Stochastic models are adopted or developed for each type of behavior to enable the evaluation of the impact of human behavior on energy use in buildings, during either the design or operation phase. We will also demonstrate the use of the technical framework in assessing the impact of occupancy behavior on energy saving technologies. The technical framework presented is part of our human behavior research, a 5-year program under the U.S. - China Clean Energy Research Center for Building Energy Efficiency.

10abuilding simulation10aenergy efficiency10aframework10aoccupant behavior10aXML schema1 aTurner, William, J. N.1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/technical-framework-describe-occupant02003nas a2200217 4500008003900000245008000039210006900119520131400188653002401502653001501526653001301541653001301554653002201567653002101589653002501610100001401635700001201649700001701661700001901678856008801697 2013 d00aData Analysis and Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in Large Office Buildings0 aData Analysis and Modeling of Lighting Energy Use in Large Offic3 a

Lighting consumes about 20 to 40% of total electricity use in large office buildings in the U.S. and China. In order to develop better lighting simulation models it is crucial to understand the characteristics of lighting energy use. This paper analyzes the main characteristics of lighting energy use over various time scales, based on the statistical analysis of measured lighting energy use of 17 large office buildings in Beijing and Hong Kong. It was found that the daily 24-hour variations of lighting energy use were mainly driven by the schedule of the building occupants. Outdoor illumination levels have little impact on lighting energy use in large office buildings due to the lack of automatic daylighting controls and relatively small perimeter areas. A stochastic lighting energy use model was developed based on different occupant activities during six time periods throughout a day, and the annual distribution of lighting power across those periods. The model was verified using measured lighting energy use of one selected building. This study demonstrates how statistical analysis and stochastic modeling can be applied to lighting energy use. The developed lighting model can be adopted by building energy modeling programs to improve the simulation accuracy of lighting energy use.

10abuilding simulation10aenergy use10alighting10amodeling10aoccupant behavior10aoffice buildings10aPoisson distribution1 aZhou, Xin1 aYan, Da1 aRen, Xiaoxin1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/data-analysis-and-modeling-lighting03302nas a2200229 4500008003900000245012400039210006900163260005100232300001200283490000800295520248200303653003102785653002402816653001502840653002802855653003202883653001702915100001902932700002002951700001802971856008302989 2013 d00aA Fresh Look at Weather Impact on Peak Electricity Demand and Energy Use of Buildings Using 30-Year Actual Weather Data0 aFresh Look at Weather Impact on Peak Electricity Demand and Ener bLawrence Berkeley National Laboratoryc11/2013 a333-3500 v1113 a

Buildings consume more than one third of the world’s total primary energy. Weather plays a unique and significant role as it directly affects the thermal loads and thus energy performance of buildings. The traditional simulated energy performance using Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) weather data represents the building performance for a typical year, but not necessarily the average or typical long-term performance as buildings with different energy systems and designs respond differently to weather changes. Furthermore, the single-year TMY simulations do not provide a range of results that capture yearly variations due to changing weather, which is important for building energy management, and for performing risk assessments of energy efficiency investments. This paper employs large-scale building simulation (a total of 3162 runs) to study the weather impact on peak electricity demand and energy use with the 30-year (1980–2009) Actual Meteorological Year (AMY) weather data for three types of office buildings at two design efficiency levels, across all 17 ASHRAE climate zones. The simulated results using the AMY data are compared to those from the TMY3 data to determine and analyze the differences. Besides further demonstration, as done by other studies, that actual weather has a significant impact on both the peak electricity demand and energy use of buildings, the main findings from the current study include: (1) annual weather variation has a greater impact on the peak electricity demand than it does on energy use in buildings; (2) the simulated energy use using the TMY3 weather data is not necessarily representative of the average energy use over a long period, and the TMY3 results can be significantly higher or lower than those from the AMY data; (3) the weather impact is greater for buildings in colder climates than warmer climates; (4) the weather impact on the medium-sized office building was the greatest, followed by the large office and then the small office; and (5) simulated energy savings and peak demand reduction by energy conservation measures using the TMY3 weather data can be significantly underestimated or overestimated. It is crucial to run multi-decade simulations with AMY weather data to fully assess the impact of weather on the long-term performance of buildings, and to evaluate the energy savings potential of energy conservation measures for new and existing buildings from a life cycle perspective.

10aActual meteorological year10abuilding simulation10aenergy use10aPeak electricity demand10aTypical meteorological year10aweather data1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aChang, Wen-Kuei1 aLin, Hung-Wen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/fresh-look-weather-impact-peak02408nas a2200229 4500008003900000022001400039245011700053210006900170260001200239300001200251490000600263520165000269653002401919653002001943653002201963653002201985653002102007653002502028100002002053700001902073856008602092 2013 d a1996-874400aStatistical Analysis and Modeling of Occupancy Patterns in Open-Plan Offices using Measured Lighting-Switch Data0 aStatistical Analysis and Modeling of Occupancy Patterns in OpenP c03/2013 a23–320 v63 a

Occupancy profile is one of the driving factors behind discrepancies between the measured and simulated energy consumption of buildings. The frequencies of occupants leaving their offices and the corresponding durations of absences have significant impact on energy use and the operational controls of buildings. This study used statistical methods to analyze the occupancy status, based on measured lighting-switch data in five-minute intervals, for a total of 200 open-plan (cubicle) offices. Five typical occupancy patterns were identified based on the average daily 24-hour profiles of the presence of occupants in their cubicles. These statistical patterns were represented by a one-square curve, a one-valley curve, a two-valley curve, a variable curve, and a flat curve. The key parameters that define the occupancy model are the average occupancy profile together with probability distributions of absence duration, and the number of times an occupant is absent from the cubicle. The statistical results also reveal that the number of absence occurrences decreases as total daily presence hours decrease, and the duration of absence from the cubicle decreases as the frequency of absence increases. The developed occupancy model captures the stochastic nature of occupants moving in and out of cubicles, and can be used to generate a more realistic occupancy schedule. This is crucial for improving the evaluation of the energy saving potential of occupancy based technologies and controls using building simulations. Finally, to demonstrate the use of the occupancy model, weekday occupant schedules were generated and discussed.

10abuilding simulation10aoccupancy model10aoccupancy pattern10aoccupant schedule10aoffice buildings10astatistical analysis1 aChang, Wen-Kuei1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/statistical-analysis-and-modeling00784nas a2200241 4500008004100000245006200041210006200103260003200165653004300197653003700240653002400277653001500301653000900316653001000325653001500335653003000350653000900380100001600389700001900405700001200424700001700436856008900453 2012 eng d00aComparative research in building energy modeling programs0 aComparative research in building energy modeling programs aChina (in Chinese)c06/201110aadvanced building software: energyplus10abuilding energy modeling program10abuilding simulation10acomparison10adest10adoe-210aenergyplus10asimulation research group10atest1 aZhu, Dandan1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aYan, Da1 aWang, Chuang uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/comparative-research-building-energy02242nas a2200181 4500008004100000245007300041210006900114260003300183520159100216653003201807653002401839653002401863653003001887653001801917100001801935700001901953856008801972 2012 eng d00aAn In-Depth Analysis of Space Heating Energy Use in Office Buildings0 aInDepth Analysis of Space Heating Energy Use in Office Buildings aAsilomar, CAbACEEEc08/20123 a

Space heating represents the largest end use in the U.S. buildings and consumes more than 7 trillion Joules of site energy annually [USDOE]. Analyzing building space heating performance and identifying methods for saving energy are quite important. Hence, it is crucial to identify and evaluate key driving factors to space heating energy use to support the design and operation of low energy buildings.

In this study, the prototypical small and large-size office buildings of the USDOE commercial reference buildings, which comply with ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004, are selected. Key design and operation factors were identified to evaluate their degrees of impact for space heating energy use. Simulation results demonstrate that some of the selected building design and operation parameters have more significant impacts on space heating energy use than others, on the other hand, good operation practice can save more space heating energy than raising design efficiency levels of an office building. Influence of weather data used in simulations on space heating energy is found to be significant. The simulated space heating energy use is further benchmarked against those from similar office buildings in two U.S. commercial buildings databases to better understand the discrepancies.

Simulated results from this study and space heating energy use collected from building databases can both vary in two potentially well overlapped wide ranges depending on details of building design and operation, not necessarily that simulation always under-predicts the reality.

10abuilding energy performance10abuilding simulation10asimulation research10asimulation research group10aspace heating1 aLin, Hung-Wen1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/depth-analysis-space-heating-energy02363nas a2200241 4500008004100000245007600041210006900117260002600186520159800212653002401810653001401834653001001848653002401858653003101882653001801913653003001931100002101961700001401982700001301996700001902009700001402028856007902042 2012 eng d00aA Retrofit Tool for Improving Energy Efficiency of Commercial Buildings0 aRetrofit Tool for Improving Energy Efficiency of Commercial Buil aAsilomar, CAc08/20123 a

Existing buildings will dominate energy use in commercial buildings in the United States for three decades or longer and even in China for the about two decades. Retrofitting these buildings to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy use is thus critical to achieving the target of reducing energy use in the buildings sector. However there are few evaluation tools that can quickly identify and evaluate energy savings and cost effectiveness of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for retrofits, especially for buildings in China. This paper discusses methods used to develop such a tool and demonstrates an application of the tool for a retrofit analysis. The tool builds on a building performance database with pre-calculated energy consumption of ECMs for selected commercial prototype buildings using the EnergyPlus program. The tool allows users to evaluate individual ECMs or a package of ECMs. It covers building envelope, lighting and daylighting, HVAC, plug loads, service hot water, and renewable energy. The prototype building can be customized to represent an actual building with some limitations. Energy consumption from utility bills can be entered into the tool to compare and calibrate the energy use of the prototype building. The tool currently can evaluate energy savings and payback of ECMs for shopping malls in China. We have used the tool to assess energy and cost savings for retrofit of the prototype shopping mall in Shanghai. Future work on the tool will simplify its use and expand it to cover other commercial building types and other countries. 

10abuilding simulation10abuildings10aChina10acommercial building10aenergy efficiency measures10aretrofit tool10asimulation research group1 aLevine, Mark, D.1 aFeng, Wei1 aKe, Jing1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aZhou, Nan uhttp://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2012/data/papers/0193-000098.pdf#page=100666nas a2200229 4500008004100000245004000041210003800081260001800119653002400137653001500161653000900176653002000185653001500205653002400220653003000244653001500274100001600289700001700305700001200322700001900334856008300353 2011 eng d00aA Comparison of DeST and EnergyPlus0 aComparison of DeST and EnergyPlus aBeijingc201110abuilding simulation10acomparison10adest10aenergy modeling10aenergyplus10asimulation research10asimulation research group10atest cases1 aZhu, Dandan1 aWang, Chuang1 aYan, Da1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/comparison-dest-and-energyplus02106nas a2200169 4500008004100000245010100041210006900142260001200211490000600223520151300229653002401742653001801766653002401784653002201808100002001830856008601850 2011 eng d00aCo-simulation of building energy and control systems with the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed0 aCosimulation of building energy and control systems with the Bui c11/20100 v33 a

This article describes the implementation of the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB). The BCVTB is a software environment that allows connecting different simulation programs to exchange data during the time integration, and that allows conducting hardware in the loop simulation. The software architecture is a modular design based on Ptolemy II, a software environment for design and analysis of heterogeneous systems. Ptolemy II provides a graphical model building environment, synchronizes the exchanged data and visualizes the system evolution during run-time. The BCVTB provides additions to Ptolemy II that allow the run-time coupling of different simulation programs for data exchange, including EnergyPlus, MATLAB, Simulink and the Modelica modelling and simulation environment Dymola. The additions also allow executing system commands, such as a script that executes a Radiance simulation. In this article, the software architecture is presented and the mathematical model used to implement the co-simulation is discussed. The simulation program interface that the BCVTB provides is explained. The article concludes by presenting applications in which different state of the art simulation programs are linked for run-time data exchange. This link allows the use of the simulation program that is best suited for the particular problem to model building heat transfer, HVAC system dynamics and control algorithms, and to compute a solution to the coupled problem using co-simulation.

10abuilding simulation10aco-simulation10aintegrated analysis10amodular modelling1 aWetter, Michael uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/co-simulation-building-energy-and00768nas a2200241 4500008004100000245005700041210005700098260002300155653004300178653002400221653001500245653001100260653001200271653001300283653001800296653003000314100002200344700001800366700001800384700001700402700001900419856008800438 2011 eng d00aModeling and simulation of HVAC faults in EnergyPlus0 aModeling and simulation of HVAC faults in EnergyPlus aAustraliac11/201110aadvanced building software: energyplus10abuilding simulation10aenergyplus10afaults10afouling10amodeling10asensor offset10asimulation research group1 aBasarkar, Mangesh1 aHaves, Philip1 aPang, Xiufeng1 aWang, Liping1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/modeling-and-simulation-hvac-faults03910nas a2200229 4500008004100000245013300041210006900174260006100243300001200304490000600316520299300322653002403315653004003339653007503379653003403454653001903488653003403507653001003541100001903551700002203570856008803592 2010 eng d00aAssessment of Energy Savings Potential from the Use of Demand Control Ventilation Systems in General Office Spaces in California0 aAssessment of Energy Savings Potential from the Use of Demand Co aBerkeleybLawrence Berkeley National Laboratoryc06/2010 a117-1240 v33 a

Demand controlled ventilation (DCV) was evaluated for general office spaces in California. A medium size office building meeting the prescriptive requirements of the 2008 California building energy efficiency standards (CEC 2008) was assumed in the building energy simulations performed with the EnergyPlus program to calculate the DCV energy savings potential in five typical California climates. Three design occupancy densities and two minimum ventilation rates were used as model inputs to cover a broader range of design variations. The assumed values of minimum ventilation rates in offices without DCV, based on two different measurement methods, were 81 and 28 cfm per occupant. These rates are based on the co‐author's unpublished analyses of data from EPA's survey of 100 U.S. office buildings. These minimum ventilation rates exceed the 15 to 20 cfm per person required in most ventilation standards for offices. The cost effectiveness of applying DCV in general office spaces was estimated via a life cycle cost analyses that considered system costs and energy cost reductions.

The results of the energy modeling indicate that the energy savings potential of DCV is largest in the desert area of California (climate zone 14), followed by Mountains (climate zone 16), Central Valley (climate zone 12), North Coast (climate zone 3), and South Coast (climate zone 6).

The results of the life cycle cost analysis show DCV is cost effective for office spaces if the typical minimum ventilation rates without DCV is 81 cfm per person, except at the low design occupancy of 10 people per 1000 ft2 in climate zones 3 and 6. At the low design occupancy of 10 people per 1000 ft2, the greatest DCV life cycle cost savings is a net present value (NPV) of $0.52/ft2 in climate zone 14, followed by $0.32/ft2 in climate zone 16 and $0.19/ft2 in climate zone 12. At the medium design occupancy of 15 people per 1000 ft2, the DCV savings are higher with a NPV $0.93/ft2 in climate zone 14, followed by $0.55/ft2 in climate zone 16, $0.46/ft2 in climate zone 12, $0.30/ft2 in climate zone 3, $0.16/ft2 in climate zone 3. At the high design occupancy of 20 people per 1000 ft2, the DCV savings are even higher with a NPV $1.37/ft2 in climate zone 14, followed by $0.86/ft2 in climate zone 16, $0.84/ft2 in climate zone 3, $0.82/ft2 in climate zone 12, and $0.65/ft2 in climate zone 6.

DCV was not found to be cost effective if the typical minimum ventilation rate without DCV is 28 cfm per occupant, except at high design occupancy of 20 people per 1000 ft2 in climate zones 14 and 16.

Until the large uncertainties about the base case ventilation rates in offices without DCV are reduced, the case for requiring DCV in general office spaces will be a weak case.

10abuilding simulation10acalifornia building energy standard10aCommercial Building Ventilation and Indoor Environmental Quality Group10ademand controlled ventilation10aenergy savings10aindoor environment department10aother1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aFisk, William, J. uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/assessment-energy-savings-potential01692nas a2200205 4500008004100000245011400041210006900155260000900224300001200233490000700245520103500252653002401287653001001311653002201321653000901343653000801352100001801360700001901378856008901397 2009 eng d00aComparison of energy efficiency between variable refrigerant flow systems and ground source heat pump systems0 aComparison of energy efficiency between variable refrigerant flo c2009 a584-5890 v423 a

With the current movement towards net zero energy buildings, many technologies are promoted with emphasis on their superior energy efficiency. The variable refrigerant flow (VRF) and ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems are probably the most competitive technologies among these. However, there are few studies reporting the energy efficiency of VRF systems compared with GSHP systems. In this article, a preliminary comparison of energy efficiency between the air-source VRF and GSHP systems is presented. The computer simulation results show that GSHP system is more energy efficient than the air-source VRF system for conditioning a small office building in two selected US climates. In general, GSHP system is more energy efficient than the air-source VRV system, especially when the building has significant heating loads. For buildings with less heating loads, the GSHP system could still perform better than the air-source VRF system in terms of energy efficiency, but the resulting energy savings may be marginal.

10abuilding simulation10adoe-210aenergy efficiency10agshp10avrf1 aLiu, Xiaobing1 aHong, Tianzhen uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/comparison-energy-efficiency-between00545nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001400041245005700055210005700112260001500169653002400184653002000208653001500228653001300243100001900256700002100275700001800296856004900314 2008 eng d aLBNL-822E00aEnergyPlus Analysis Capabilities for Use in Title 240 aEnergyPlus Analysis Capabilities for Use in Title 24 bLBNLc200810abuilding simulation10acode compliance10aenergyplus10atitle 241 aHong, Tianzhen1 aBuhl, Walter, F.1 aHaves, Philip uhttp://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0z78090x01168nas a2200169 4500008004100000245007600041210006900117260001200186300001200198490000700210520062300217653002400840100001900864700001900883700001500902856008100917 2000 eng d00aBuilding simulation: an overview of development and information sources0 aBuilding simulation an overview of development and information s c05/2000 a347-3610 v353 a

We review the state-of-the-art on the development and application of computer-aided building simulation by addressing some crucial questions in the field. Although the answers are not intended to be comprehensive, they are sufficiently varied to provide an overview ranging from the historical and technical development to choosing a suitable simulation program and performing building simulation. Popular icons of major interested agencies and simulation tools and key information sources are highlighted. Future trends in the design and operation of energy-efficient ‘green' buildings are briefly described.

10abuilding simulation1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aChou, Siaw, K.1 aBong, T.Y. uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/building-simulation-overview01723nas a2200217 4500008004100000245005700041210005500098260001200153300001200165490000700177520108800184653002401272653001501296653001001311653002601321653001701347100001901364700001901383700001501402856008801417 1999 eng d00aA design day for building load and energy estimation0 adesign day for building load and energy estimation c07/1999 a469-4770 v343 a

We describe how a design day for building energy performance simulation can be selected from a typical meteorological year of a location. The advantages of the design day weather file are its simplicity and flexibility in use with simulation programs. The design day is selected using a weather parameter comprising the daily average dry bulb temperature and total solar insolation. The selection criterion addresses the balance between the need to minimise the part-load performance of the air-conditioning systems and plants and the number of hours of load not met. To validate the versatility of the design day weather file, we compare simulation results of the peak load and load profile of a building obtained from the DOE-2.1E code and a specially developed load estimation program, PEAKLOAD. PEAKLOAD is developed using the transfer function method and ASHRAE databases. Comparative results are in good agreement, indicating that a design day thus selected can be used when quick answers are required and simulations using a TMY file cannot be easily done or justified.

10abuilding simulation10adesign day10adoe-210apeak load calculation10aweather data1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aChou, Siaw, K.1 aBong, T.Y. uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/design-day-building-load-and-energy01533nas a2200205 4500008004100000245005900041210005800100260000900158300001200167490000700179520095600186653000801142653002401150653000901174653002301183653000801206100001901214700001401233856008001247 1997 eng d00aIISABRE: An integrated building simulation environment0 aIISABRE An integrated building simulation environment c1997 a219-2240 v323 a

An integrated building simulation environment, IISABRE, is introduced. IISABRE consists of CABD, BTP and IISPAM. CABD is an AutoCAD-based building descriptor enabling users to draw a building and define information. Some design tools are built into CABD, and a STEP-based building database can be generated, which provides an open mechanism to share the building database with other programs. BTP is a program for the detailed dynamic simulation of building thermal performance. With a PC 486DX50 (8M RAM) running in MS-Windows 3.11, BTP needs about 40 minutes to calculate the annual hourly energy demand for a building with 20 zones. IISPAM is a knowledge-based system for translating the STEP-based building database into ASCII-based data files for BTP. IISABRE can be widely employed in the field of building environmental engineering in order to improve the energy efficiency of buildings and the thermal comfort of the indoor environment.

10abtp10abuilding simulation10adest10aenergy performance10agui1 aHong, Tianzhen1 aJiang, Yi uhttps://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/publications/iisabre-integrated-building